"It took us a long time to find out that we had been lied to by our parents' generation. The moralities that were followed during our parents' generation were basically arbitrary. This caused a rift between the two generations, which was brought on by the beatniks"
About this Quote
Fonda is talking like a guy who watched the American Dream develop a hairline fracture, then split clean down the middle. His phrasing is blunt, almost stubbornly unpoetic: “a long time,” “lied to,” “basically arbitrary.” That’s the point. He’s not building a theory; he’s describing the slow, dawning hangover after postwar optimism, when the rules you were told to live by started looking less like ethics and more like housekeeping for a social order that needed to stay tidy.
“Lied to” does a lot of work here. It’s not just that parents were wrong; it’s that the wrongness feels organized, inherited, and protected by politeness. Calling their “moralities” arbitrary isn’t adolescent nihilism so much as an accusation that the code was enforced because it was useful, not because it was true. That’s a generational indictment with a political edge: if morality is arbitrary, then obedience is the real value being taught.
Then he pins the “rift” on the beatniks, which is revealing in its own way. The beat movement becomes a kind of cultural scapegoat and catalyst at once: the first visible permission structure for refusing the script. In the popular imagination, beatniks weren’t policy wonks; they were vibes with teeth - a public rejection of conformity, consumerism, and sanitized masculinity.
Coming from Fonda, this lands as both memoir and mythmaking: a star of counterculture cinema narrating the prehistory of his own moment. It frames the ’60s not as a spontaneous rebellion but as a delayed recognition that the “normal” everyone protected had always been, at least partly, a performance.
“Lied to” does a lot of work here. It’s not just that parents were wrong; it’s that the wrongness feels organized, inherited, and protected by politeness. Calling their “moralities” arbitrary isn’t adolescent nihilism so much as an accusation that the code was enforced because it was useful, not because it was true. That’s a generational indictment with a political edge: if morality is arbitrary, then obedience is the real value being taught.
Then he pins the “rift” on the beatniks, which is revealing in its own way. The beat movement becomes a kind of cultural scapegoat and catalyst at once: the first visible permission structure for refusing the script. In the popular imagination, beatniks weren’t policy wonks; they were vibes with teeth - a public rejection of conformity, consumerism, and sanitized masculinity.
Coming from Fonda, this lands as both memoir and mythmaking: a star of counterculture cinema narrating the prehistory of his own moment. It frames the ’60s not as a spontaneous rebellion but as a delayed recognition that the “normal” everyone protected had always been, at least partly, a performance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Peter
Add to List


