"It was a good 15 or 20 years before anyone at Rand would be in the same room with me. They didn't want the question raised, 'What's your relationship with Daniel Ellsberg?' And not one of them wrote me a letter because they didn't want a letter of theirs to show up in my trash - which the FBI had been going through"
About this Quote
Paranoia doesn’t just chill dissent; it rewires the social circuitry around it. Ellsberg’s memory lands hardest in the petty, humiliating details: colleagues refusing to share a room, the absence of a simple letter, the image of the FBI pawing through garbage. That’s the point. He’s not describing an argument about policy or loyalty; he’s showing how a national-security state makes ordinary human contact feel like contraband.
The specific intent is double-edged. Ellsberg is testifying to retaliation after the Pentagon Papers, but he’s also indicting a culture of professional self-preservation at RAND, the very kind of institution that sells itself as rational and dispassionate. The subtext is that the punishment didn’t require firings or show trials. It relied on reputational contagion: “What’s your relationship with Daniel Ellsberg?” becomes a career-ending question, and everyone learns to preempt it by practicing social quarantine.
His best move is the line about the trash. It’s blunt, almost domestic, and that’s why it stings. Surveillance isn’t rendered as high-tech omniscience; it’s rendered as invasive banality. People don’t avoid him because they’ve suddenly decided he’s wrong; they avoid him because the state has made association legible and therefore risky.
Context matters: Ellsberg’s case unfolded in an era when the government’s response to leaks included illegal break-ins, wiretaps, and harassment. The quote captures the lasting aftermath: the real deterrent isn’t prison alone, it’s the long shadow that turns coworkers into risk managers and friendship into evidence.
The specific intent is double-edged. Ellsberg is testifying to retaliation after the Pentagon Papers, but he’s also indicting a culture of professional self-preservation at RAND, the very kind of institution that sells itself as rational and dispassionate. The subtext is that the punishment didn’t require firings or show trials. It relied on reputational contagion: “What’s your relationship with Daniel Ellsberg?” becomes a career-ending question, and everyone learns to preempt it by practicing social quarantine.
His best move is the line about the trash. It’s blunt, almost domestic, and that’s why it stings. Surveillance isn’t rendered as high-tech omniscience; it’s rendered as invasive banality. People don’t avoid him because they’ve suddenly decided he’s wrong; they avoid him because the state has made association legible and therefore risky.
Context matters: Ellsberg’s case unfolded in an era when the government’s response to leaks included illegal break-ins, wiretaps, and harassment. The quote captures the lasting aftermath: the real deterrent isn’t prison alone, it’s the long shadow that turns coworkers into risk managers and friendship into evidence.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Daniel
Add to List

