"It was a place without a single feature of the space-time matrix that he knew. It was a place where nothing yet had happened - an utter emptiness. There was neither light nor dark: there was nothing here but emptiness"
About this Quote
Simak drops you into the kind of emptiness that isn’t scenic, isn’t even spooky, but actively hostile to the mind’s need for coordinates. “Without a single feature of the space-time matrix” is the key tell: this isn’t a dark room or a dead planet. It’s reality with the familiar user interface stripped off. By invoking the “matrix” he signals a mid-century, science-literate sensibility - the universe as a knowable system - then snaps that comfort in half. The terror is not monsters; it’s the collapse of physics as a shared language.
The line “nothing yet had happened” does sly work. “Yet” implies time, and time implies sequence, causality, narrative - all the things that make a self feel continuous. Simak suggests a void that sits before event itself, a pre-cosmic blank where even “before” is hard to defend. That’s why he refuses the usual gothic binaries (“neither light nor dark”): darkness would still be a condition. He denies even the negations that fiction typically uses to paint absence.
Context matters: Simak’s science fiction often treats the human as small, decent, and bewildered in the face of vast systems. Here, the subtext is epistemological dread: if the universe can present you with a place that has no “features,” then perception and knowledge are contingent, maybe provincial. The emptiness isn’t just out there; it’s a critique of our assumption that reality must be legible.
The line “nothing yet had happened” does sly work. “Yet” implies time, and time implies sequence, causality, narrative - all the things that make a self feel continuous. Simak suggests a void that sits before event itself, a pre-cosmic blank where even “before” is hard to defend. That’s why he refuses the usual gothic binaries (“neither light nor dark”): darkness would still be a condition. He denies even the negations that fiction typically uses to paint absence.
Context matters: Simak’s science fiction often treats the human as small, decent, and bewildered in the face of vast systems. Here, the subtext is epistemological dread: if the universe can present you with a place that has no “features,” then perception and knowledge are contingent, maybe provincial. The emptiness isn’t just out there; it’s a critique of our assumption that reality must be legible.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by Clifford
Add to List
