"It was always my intention that The Frieze should be housed in a room which would provide a suitable architectural frame for it"
About this Quote
Munch isn’t talking about a neutral wall; he’s talking about control. “Always my intention” reads like a quiet rebuttal to the way modern audiences treat paintings as portable images, interchangeable and infinitely reproducible. For Munch, The Frieze (his recurring cycle of works about love, anxiety, jealousy, and death) was never meant to be a set of singles. It was conceived as an environment: pictures that speak across corners, along sightlines, through rhythm and repetition. The “room” isn’t mere display infrastructure; it’s part of the artwork’s psychological machinery.
The phrase “suitable architectural frame” is doing double duty. On the surface, it’s practical: scale, light, sequence, distance. Underneath, it’s a bid to choreograph feeling. Architecture governs the body before the mind catches up; it tells you where to stand, how long to linger, what to see first. Munch wanted the viewer’s movement to be edited the way his imagery is edited: constricted, pressured, unable to fully escape the emotional narrative.
Context matters: this is late-19th/early-20th-century art as a new kind of total experience, not just an object for collectors. Munch is adjacent to Symbolist and proto-Expressionist ambitions to build “moods” as much as pictures, in an era when exhibitions and bourgeois interiors could domesticate even the most unsettling work. By insisting on a room, he’s refusing domestication. He’s claiming authorship not only of the painted surface, but of the conditions under which its unease lands.
The phrase “suitable architectural frame” is doing double duty. On the surface, it’s practical: scale, light, sequence, distance. Underneath, it’s a bid to choreograph feeling. Architecture governs the body before the mind catches up; it tells you where to stand, how long to linger, what to see first. Munch wanted the viewer’s movement to be edited the way his imagery is edited: constricted, pressured, unable to fully escape the emotional narrative.
Context matters: this is late-19th/early-20th-century art as a new kind of total experience, not just an object for collectors. Munch is adjacent to Symbolist and proto-Expressionist ambitions to build “moods” as much as pictures, in an era when exhibitions and bourgeois interiors could domesticate even the most unsettling work. By insisting on a room, he’s refusing domestication. He’s claiming authorship not only of the painted surface, but of the conditions under which its unease lands.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Edvard
Add to List






