"It will be undertaken, of course, in the June or July summit, and then to bring NATO closer to Russia or vice versa is a way to move toward integration - toward the integration of Europe"
About this Quote
Diplomat-speak can be a form of anesthetic, and Warren Christopher deploys it here with the smoothness of someone trying to move a surgical instrument without the patient flinching. The line is built on soft inevitabilities: "will be undertaken, of course" and the hazy scheduling of a "June or July summit". That vagueness is the point. It turns a consequential shift in European security into administrative housekeeping, as if history itself runs on a calendar invite.
The rhetorical trick is the phrase "bring NATO closer to Russia or vice versa". It frames proximity as mutual, symmetrical, and almost organic, scrubbing away the real asymmetry: NATO is a U.S.-anchored military alliance expanding its orbit, and Russia is the post-Soviet state being asked to reimagine its status from great-power rival to prospective partner. Christopher’s "or vice versa" invites Moscow to feel agency while subtly asserting the direction of travel is already set.
Then comes the big payoff word: "integration". Not "containment", not "deterrence", not "management of risk" - but integration, the moral language of post-Cold War optimism. It’s a bid to recast security architecture as European destiny: draw Russia nearer, and you’re not moving borders or baselines; you’re "integrating Europe". The subtext is a wager that institutions can outrun resentment - that if you build enough meetings, mechanisms, and proximity, you can convert a former adversary into a stakeholder before old reflexes return.
The rhetorical trick is the phrase "bring NATO closer to Russia or vice versa". It frames proximity as mutual, symmetrical, and almost organic, scrubbing away the real asymmetry: NATO is a U.S.-anchored military alliance expanding its orbit, and Russia is the post-Soviet state being asked to reimagine its status from great-power rival to prospective partner. Christopher’s "or vice versa" invites Moscow to feel agency while subtly asserting the direction of travel is already set.
Then comes the big payoff word: "integration". Not "containment", not "deterrence", not "management of risk" - but integration, the moral language of post-Cold War optimism. It’s a bid to recast security architecture as European destiny: draw Russia nearer, and you’re not moving borders or baselines; you’re "integrating Europe". The subtext is a wager that institutions can outrun resentment - that if you build enough meetings, mechanisms, and proximity, you can convert a former adversary into a stakeholder before old reflexes return.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Warren
Add to List


