"It would be hard to find a more compelling example of the American dream than Alberto Gonzales"
About this Quote
Calling Alberto Gonzales the most "compelling" proof of the American dream isn’t just praise; it’s a strategic conversion of biography into political argument. Jon Kyl, a Republican senator speaking in the era when Gonzales was being elevated as a historic Latino nominee (and later attorney general), is doing what Washington does best: turning a person into a symbol so the system itself can claim credit.
The intent is twofold. First, it burnishes Gonzales as unimpeachable: an immigrant-origin success story whose résumé can be read as merit made visible. Second, it preemptively frames any criticism of Gonzales as criticism of the dream itself. If Gonzales is the dream, opponents risk looking like they’re attacking aspiration, not policy. That’s a handy shield in confirmation politics, where character and narrative often substitute for scrutiny of legal philosophy, independence, or executive-branch loyalty.
The subtext is assimilationist and institutional: America works because its institutions can elevate the deserving, even from historically marginalized communities. That message flatters the country and reassures nervous moderates. It also quietly narrows the meaning of "American dream" to upward mobility within existing power structures, not the hard questions about who gets stuck outside them.
The line’s rhetorical strength is its simplicity and absoluteness: “hard to find” dares you to challenge it, and “compelling” invites emotional agreement. In a moment when representation was politically valuable, Kyl’s sentence sells inclusion while keeping the conversation safely away from the messy mechanics of power.
The intent is twofold. First, it burnishes Gonzales as unimpeachable: an immigrant-origin success story whose résumé can be read as merit made visible. Second, it preemptively frames any criticism of Gonzales as criticism of the dream itself. If Gonzales is the dream, opponents risk looking like they’re attacking aspiration, not policy. That’s a handy shield in confirmation politics, where character and narrative often substitute for scrutiny of legal philosophy, independence, or executive-branch loyalty.
The subtext is assimilationist and institutional: America works because its institutions can elevate the deserving, even from historically marginalized communities. That message flatters the country and reassures nervous moderates. It also quietly narrows the meaning of "American dream" to upward mobility within existing power structures, not the hard questions about who gets stuck outside them.
The line’s rhetorical strength is its simplicity and absoluteness: “hard to find” dares you to challenge it, and “compelling” invites emotional agreement. In a moment when representation was politically valuable, Kyl’s sentence sells inclusion while keeping the conversation safely away from the messy mechanics of power.
Quote Details
| Topic | Success |
|---|
More Quotes by Jon
Add to List
