"It would be ideal if we could have an uncontrolled flow of information. But we realized you can't do that"
About this Quote
The line pretends to mourn a lost utopia while quietly defending the machinery that makes utopias impossible. “It would be ideal” dangles a civil-liberties fantasy - frictionless information, citizens fully informed, power transparent - then snaps it shut with “But we realized you can’t do that,” a phrase doing the work of a whole national-security doctrine. The passive construction matters: not “I decided” or “we chose,” but “we realized,” as if constraint is a law of nature rather than a political preference.
Coming from John Poindexter, a Reagan-era national security figure later tied to surveillance initiatives, the sentence reads like a bureaucrat’s version of tragic wisdom. It acknowledges the democratic impulse toward openness, then reframes openness as naive, even dangerous. The “uncontrolled flow” is the tell: information isn’t treated as speech or knowledge but as a substance that must be regulated, like weapons-grade material. “Uncontrolled” primes the listener to picture chaos, sabotage, adversaries exploiting transparency - so control becomes synonymous with responsibility.
The subtext is less about information than about who gets to manage reality. In the post-Watergate, Cold War-to-post-Cold War security state, “control” often means classification, compartmentalization, and, later, data collection justified by secrecy. The quote sells that apparatus with a shrug, a tone of reluctant adulthood: we’d love to live in the free-information world, but the grown-ups have seen what happens when you try.
It’s persuasive because it flatters the audience’s fear. It asks you to trade a principle for an imagined catastrophe - and to call that trade “realism.”
Coming from John Poindexter, a Reagan-era national security figure later tied to surveillance initiatives, the sentence reads like a bureaucrat’s version of tragic wisdom. It acknowledges the democratic impulse toward openness, then reframes openness as naive, even dangerous. The “uncontrolled flow” is the tell: information isn’t treated as speech or knowledge but as a substance that must be regulated, like weapons-grade material. “Uncontrolled” primes the listener to picture chaos, sabotage, adversaries exploiting transparency - so control becomes synonymous with responsibility.
The subtext is less about information than about who gets to manage reality. In the post-Watergate, Cold War-to-post-Cold War security state, “control” often means classification, compartmentalization, and, later, data collection justified by secrecy. The quote sells that apparatus with a shrug, a tone of reluctant adulthood: we’d love to live in the free-information world, but the grown-ups have seen what happens when you try.
It’s persuasive because it flatters the audience’s fear. It asks you to trade a principle for an imagined catastrophe - and to call that trade “realism.”
Quote Details
| Topic | Privacy & Cybersecurity |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by John
Add to List




