"It would be unthinkable in Canadian public life today for the public inauguration of our supreme political figures to be accompanied by prayer"
About this Quote
“It would be unthinkable” is doing more than describing a norm; it’s diagnosing a cultural boundary that has hardened into taboo. Stockwell Day, a politician steeped in Canada’s conservative currents, isn’t merely lamenting the absence of prayer at inaugurations. He’s pointing to a broader shift in what public institutions are allowed to sound like: a state that once nodded comfortably toward Christianity now treats explicit religiosity as politically radioactive.
The sentence is engineered to provoke. By choosing “unthinkable,” Day implies not just that prayer is uncommon, but that the public sphere has become intellectually policed - that certain ideas are pre-rejected before debate even starts. It’s a subtle reframing: secularism isn’t presented as a neutral arrangement among diverse citizens, but as an ideological regime that narrows civic expression. That’s the subtext that lands with his base: your values aren’t merely outvoted; they’re increasingly unsayable.
Context matters. Canada’s constitutional monarchy retains ceremonial religious traces, yet Canadian political culture has grown cautious about overt faith language, especially in nationally unifying rituals. Unlike the U.S., where public prayer often reads as tradition, Canada’s multicultural self-image makes it easier for leaders to treat religious ceremony as exclusion rather than heritage. Day’s line leverages that contrast: it positions Canadian elites as embarrassed by their own roots, while implying that restoring prayer would restore moral confidence.
It’s also a strategic wedge. The quote quietly recruits grievance into identity: if prayer is “unthinkable,” then believers become outsiders in their own country - and that’s a potent political story.
The sentence is engineered to provoke. By choosing “unthinkable,” Day implies not just that prayer is uncommon, but that the public sphere has become intellectually policed - that certain ideas are pre-rejected before debate even starts. It’s a subtle reframing: secularism isn’t presented as a neutral arrangement among diverse citizens, but as an ideological regime that narrows civic expression. That’s the subtext that lands with his base: your values aren’t merely outvoted; they’re increasingly unsayable.
Context matters. Canada’s constitutional monarchy retains ceremonial religious traces, yet Canadian political culture has grown cautious about overt faith language, especially in nationally unifying rituals. Unlike the U.S., where public prayer often reads as tradition, Canada’s multicultural self-image makes it easier for leaders to treat religious ceremony as exclusion rather than heritage. Day’s line leverages that contrast: it positions Canadian elites as embarrassed by their own roots, while implying that restoring prayer would restore moral confidence.
It’s also a strategic wedge. The quote quietly recruits grievance into identity: if prayer is “unthinkable,” then believers become outsiders in their own country - and that’s a potent political story.
Quote Details
| Topic | Prayer |
|---|
More Quotes by Stockwell
Add to List



