"It would be unwise to say the least, irresponsible of us at the TSA, at the Homeland Security Department not to evolve our technology to match the changing threat environment that we inhabit"
About this Quote
Built into Napolitano's sentence is a preemptive defense of an unpopular policy: if we do not expand screening tech, we are not just behind the curve, we are negligent. The line is engineered to make disagreement feel like a moral failure. "Unwise" nods to prudence, but she quickly escalates to "irresponsible", a word that swaps debate for duty. In bureaucratic America, "irresponsible" is the closest thing to heresy.
The phrasing does quiet work. "Evolve our technology" sounds organic, inevitable, almost Darwinian; it implies modernization rather than escalation. There's no mention of body scanners, data retention, false positives, or the fact that "technology" often means more intimate forms of surveillance. "Match the changing threat environment" is the classic post-9/11 elastic frame: the threat is always in motion, which means the response must always expand. It also gently shifts the burden of proof. The public doesn't get to ask, "Does this actually reduce risk?" because the premise is that risk is self-evident and ambient, something we "inhabit."
Context matters: Napolitano ran Homeland Security in an era when the TSA was under fire for security theater and intrusive screening, and when "adapt or be blamed later" was the governing logic of counterterror policy. The subtext is liability management as much as safety: if an attack happens after restraint, leadership wants a paper trail of urgency. The sentence is less a description of reality than a rhetorical firewall, built to make technological expansion sound like the only adult option.
The phrasing does quiet work. "Evolve our technology" sounds organic, inevitable, almost Darwinian; it implies modernization rather than escalation. There's no mention of body scanners, data retention, false positives, or the fact that "technology" often means more intimate forms of surveillance. "Match the changing threat environment" is the classic post-9/11 elastic frame: the threat is always in motion, which means the response must always expand. It also gently shifts the burden of proof. The public doesn't get to ask, "Does this actually reduce risk?" because the premise is that risk is self-evident and ambient, something we "inhabit."
Context matters: Napolitano ran Homeland Security in an era when the TSA was under fire for security theater and intrusive screening, and when "adapt or be blamed later" was the governing logic of counterterror policy. The subtext is liability management as much as safety: if an attack happens after restraint, leadership wants a paper trail of urgency. The sentence is less a description of reality than a rhetorical firewall, built to make technological expansion sound like the only adult option.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Janet
Add to List
