"It's a tribal state, and it always will be. Whether we like it or not, whenever we withdraw from Afghanistan, whether it's now or years from now, we'll have an incendiary situation. Should we stay and play traffic cop? I don't think that serves our strategic interests"
About this Quote
Afghanistan gets framed here not as a solvable “problem” but as a permanent condition: “tribal,” fixed, inevitably combustible. Huntsman isn’t just describing a place; he’s narrowing the menu of morally acceptable U.S. options. If instability is baked in, then nation-building starts to look like vanity, and withdrawal starts to look like realism rather than retreat.
The clever pivot is how he inoculates himself against the obvious counterargument. He concedes the nightmare up front: “whenever we withdraw...we’ll have an incendiary situation.” That admission functions like political debt paid in advance. Once he’s acknowledged the likely chaos, he can argue for leaving anyway without sounding naive. It’s less a forecast than a rhetorical permission slip: we’re allowed to exit even if things burn.
“Traffic cop” is doing heavy work. It shrinks a complex, costly military occupation into the image of a tired officer endlessly separating feuding drivers. The metaphor ridicules the mission as busywork, not strategy. Then he lands the phrase that matters in Washington: “strategic interests.” It’s a reset from moral obligation to cold prioritization, aimed at an electorate exhausted by open-ended war and at foreign-policy elites who speak the language of costs and objectives.
The subtext is a critique of American managerial hubris: the idea that with enough time, money, and expertise, the U.S. can reorder societies. Huntsman’s line doesn’t promise victory; it promises an end to pretending.
The clever pivot is how he inoculates himself against the obvious counterargument. He concedes the nightmare up front: “whenever we withdraw...we’ll have an incendiary situation.” That admission functions like political debt paid in advance. Once he’s acknowledged the likely chaos, he can argue for leaving anyway without sounding naive. It’s less a forecast than a rhetorical permission slip: we’re allowed to exit even if things burn.
“Traffic cop” is doing heavy work. It shrinks a complex, costly military occupation into the image of a tired officer endlessly separating feuding drivers. The metaphor ridicules the mission as busywork, not strategy. Then he lands the phrase that matters in Washington: “strategic interests.” It’s a reset from moral obligation to cold prioritization, aimed at an electorate exhausted by open-ended war and at foreign-policy elites who speak the language of costs and objectives.
The subtext is a critique of American managerial hubris: the idea that with enough time, money, and expertise, the U.S. can reorder societies. Huntsman’s line doesn’t promise victory; it promises an end to pretending.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Jon
Add to List





