"It's absolutely not acceptable for people to argue that, if we are going to do anything about climate change at all, well, the responsibility lies solely with the individual"
About this Quote
Garrett’s line lands like a shove against one of the most comforting myths of the climate era: that the crisis can be solved in the checkout aisle. By calling the “solely with the individual” argument “absolutely not acceptable,” he’s not nitpicking policy detail; he’s rejecting a moral bait-and-switch that has let governments and corporations off the hook for decades. The phrasing matters. “If we are going to do anything at all” mimics the weary, half-committed tone of public debate, then punctures it. He’s dramatizing how easily climate action gets downgraded into lifestyle trivia precisely when structural change becomes inconvenient.
As a musician-activist, Garrett speaks in the register of accountability rather than technocracy. There’s an implied target here: the PR playbook that reframes systemic emissions as personal virtue (recycling, shorter showers, “carbon footprints”), turning citizenship into consumer choice. The subtext is anger at misdirection. Individual action isn’t useless, but the claim of sole responsibility is a political alibi, shifting blame downward while decisions about energy grids, regulation, transport, and extraction remain centralized and heavily lobbied.
Context sharpens the edge. Garrett isn’t a detached commentator; he’s been inside the machinery of cultural persuasion as Midnight Oil’s frontman and inside the machinery of the state as an Australian politician. That dual experience shows in the sentence’s design: it’s a crowd-ready rebuke that also reads like a legislative red line. The intent is to widen the frame from “what should I do?” to “who has power, and what must they be forced to do?”
As a musician-activist, Garrett speaks in the register of accountability rather than technocracy. There’s an implied target here: the PR playbook that reframes systemic emissions as personal virtue (recycling, shorter showers, “carbon footprints”), turning citizenship into consumer choice. The subtext is anger at misdirection. Individual action isn’t useless, but the claim of sole responsibility is a political alibi, shifting blame downward while decisions about energy grids, regulation, transport, and extraction remain centralized and heavily lobbied.
Context sharpens the edge. Garrett isn’t a detached commentator; he’s been inside the machinery of cultural persuasion as Midnight Oil’s frontman and inside the machinery of the state as an Australian politician. That dual experience shows in the sentence’s design: it’s a crowd-ready rebuke that also reads like a legislative red line. The intent is to widen the frame from “what should I do?” to “who has power, and what must they be forced to do?”
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Peter
Add to List


