"It's absolutely true that it's almost impossible to play a character without having any affection for him"
About this Quote
Acting, at its core, is a long con you run on your own judgment. Michael Shanks is naming the unglamorous engine behind convincing performance: you don’t “portray” a person from the outside like a mannequin; you inhabit them. And inhabiting requires a kind of affection - not approval, not fandom, but the willingness to see the character as internally coherent, even when they’re petty, cowardly, or monstrous.
The intent here feels like a quiet rebuttal to the audience’s favorite demand: “How could you play someone like that?” Shanks implies the craft is less moral sentencing and more emotional due process. Affection becomes the actor’s investigative tool, the thing that keeps a performance from sliding into caricature. Without it, you get the easy version of badness: sneering villains, saintly heroes, a set of signals that tell viewers what to think instead of letting them feel why a person might act that way.
There’s also a protective subtext for actors themselves. In an era of fandom scrutiny and social media purity tests, “affection” offers a boundary: empathy is not endorsement. It’s a method. You can love a character the way a good therapist “loves” a patient - by staying curious, by granting them complexity, by refusing to reduce them to their worst scene.
Contextually, it fits a broader shift in prestige TV and franchise storytelling, where characters live in morally gray gradients. The performances that stick are the ones powered by that forbidden ingredient: tenderness for the flawed.
The intent here feels like a quiet rebuttal to the audience’s favorite demand: “How could you play someone like that?” Shanks implies the craft is less moral sentencing and more emotional due process. Affection becomes the actor’s investigative tool, the thing that keeps a performance from sliding into caricature. Without it, you get the easy version of badness: sneering villains, saintly heroes, a set of signals that tell viewers what to think instead of letting them feel why a person might act that way.
There’s also a protective subtext for actors themselves. In an era of fandom scrutiny and social media purity tests, “affection” offers a boundary: empathy is not endorsement. It’s a method. You can love a character the way a good therapist “loves” a patient - by staying curious, by granting them complexity, by refusing to reduce them to their worst scene.
Contextually, it fits a broader shift in prestige TV and franchise storytelling, where characters live in morally gray gradients. The performances that stick are the ones powered by that forbidden ingredient: tenderness for the flawed.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List





