"It's all about letting the story take over"
About this Quote
Stone’s line is a quiet provocation in an era that treats authorship like a brand and narrative like content to be managed. “Letting the story take over” frames writing as surrender, not control: a deliberate ceding of ego, agenda, even craft’s comforting outlines, in service of something stranger and more demanding than plot mechanics. The phrasing matters. “Letting” implies resistance has to be overcome; “take over” carries a hint of menace, as if the story is an occupying force. That’s Stone in miniature: fiction as moral weather system, not curated performance.
The subtext pushes back against the tidy myth of the novelist-as-architect. Stone’s best work (Dog Soldiers, A Flag for Sunrise) thrives on the feeling that history, drugs, war, and ideology don’t behave like themes; they behave like pressures. His characters don’t “develop” so much as get driven, tested, compromised. So when he says the story takes over, he’s describing a method suited to material where the world refuses to stay symbolic. Vietnam-era disillusionment, Cold War blowback, American appetite for escape: these aren’t backdrops, they’re engines. The writer’s job is to stay honest when the engine starts pulling the wheel.
There’s also a professional ethic buried in the simplicity. “All about” sounds almost anti-literary, a refusal of preciousness. Stone isn’t romanticizing inspiration; he’s naming a discipline: follow the consequences you’ve set in motion, even when they ruin your original plan, even when they implicate you. That’s how his fiction earns its authority: it doesn’t insist on being right; it insists on being true to the unraveling.
The subtext pushes back against the tidy myth of the novelist-as-architect. Stone’s best work (Dog Soldiers, A Flag for Sunrise) thrives on the feeling that history, drugs, war, and ideology don’t behave like themes; they behave like pressures. His characters don’t “develop” so much as get driven, tested, compromised. So when he says the story takes over, he’s describing a method suited to material where the world refuses to stay symbolic. Vietnam-era disillusionment, Cold War blowback, American appetite for escape: these aren’t backdrops, they’re engines. The writer’s job is to stay honest when the engine starts pulling the wheel.
There’s also a professional ethic buried in the simplicity. “All about” sounds almost anti-literary, a refusal of preciousness. Stone isn’t romanticizing inspiration; he’s naming a discipline: follow the consequences you’ve set in motion, even when they ruin your original plan, even when they implicate you. That’s how his fiction earns its authority: it doesn’t insist on being right; it insists on being true to the unraveling.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List


