"It's clear to me that there is no good reason for many philosophy books to sound as complicated as they do"
About this Quote
De Botton is picking a fight with philosophy’s most durable status symbol: difficulty. The line lands as a gentle provocation, but it’s also a demystification campaign. By insisting there’s “no good reason,” he frames obscurity not as intellectual necessity but as an avoidable choice, a stylistic habit that has hardened into professional armor. The target isn’t rigorous thinking; it’s the way rigor gets performed.
The subtext is cultural and economic. In academic ecosystems, complexity often functions like a bouncer: it sorts insiders from tourists, protects careers, and signals seriousness. Dense prose can be a credential in itself, a way to pre-empt criticism by making disagreement harder to articulate. De Botton’s “clear to me” is doing work, too. It’s a quiet reversal of the usual hierarchy where the reader feels inadequate; here, the author of popular philosophy positions himself as the sane observer in a room full of needless fog machines.
Context matters: de Botton emerged in the late-1990s/2000s wave that treated philosophy as a tool kit for modern anxieties (love, work, status), not an initiation rite. This sentence is a manifesto for that project, defending accessibility as ethical rather than merely commercial. It suggests a moral obligation to write in a way that respects a reader’s time and intelligence.
There’s also a polite sting: if your ideas can’t survive daylight, maybe the problem isn’t the reader. It’s the prose.
The subtext is cultural and economic. In academic ecosystems, complexity often functions like a bouncer: it sorts insiders from tourists, protects careers, and signals seriousness. Dense prose can be a credential in itself, a way to pre-empt criticism by making disagreement harder to articulate. De Botton’s “clear to me” is doing work, too. It’s a quiet reversal of the usual hierarchy where the reader feels inadequate; here, the author of popular philosophy positions himself as the sane observer in a room full of needless fog machines.
Context matters: de Botton emerged in the late-1990s/2000s wave that treated philosophy as a tool kit for modern anxieties (love, work, status), not an initiation rite. This sentence is a manifesto for that project, defending accessibility as ethical rather than merely commercial. It suggests a moral obligation to write in a way that respects a reader’s time and intelligence.
There’s also a polite sting: if your ideas can’t survive daylight, maybe the problem isn’t the reader. It’s the prose.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Alain
Add to List








