"It's difficult to believe that people are still starving in this country because food isn't available"
About this Quote
The line lands like a small moral thunderclap: in the richest country on earth, hunger isn’t a tragedy of scarcity but of arrangement. Reagan’s phrasing does something politically cunning. By stressing “because food isn’t available,” he clears away the most comforting excuse - that starvation is an unavoidable natural fact. If food exists, then starvation is policy, logistics, access, wages, bureaucracy, neglect. The sentence forces responsibility back onto human systems without naming a villain outright.
That restraint matters. Reagan, a president whose brand was optimism and market faith, isn’t indicting capitalism so much as quarantining the problem. He frames hunger as an administrative and distribution failure - a solvable glitch inside an otherwise functioning abundance. The subtext is: America has the capacity; what’s missing is coordination, prioritization, and the will to deliver. It’s a way to sound compassionate while keeping the diagnosis safely managerial rather than structural.
Historically, the remark echoes late-20th-century debates over welfare, food stamps, and the role of government versus private charity. It also reflects a recurring American discomfort: we celebrate plenty as proof of virtue, yet we treat poverty as personal misfortune. Reagan flips that script for a moment. The rhetorical power comes from its simplicity: it makes “still starving” feel like an ongoing scandal, not a sad footnote, and it does so in the plain language of a leader who understood television-era persuasion.
That restraint matters. Reagan, a president whose brand was optimism and market faith, isn’t indicting capitalism so much as quarantining the problem. He frames hunger as an administrative and distribution failure - a solvable glitch inside an otherwise functioning abundance. The subtext is: America has the capacity; what’s missing is coordination, prioritization, and the will to deliver. It’s a way to sound compassionate while keeping the diagnosis safely managerial rather than structural.
Historically, the remark echoes late-20th-century debates over welfare, food stamps, and the role of government versus private charity. It also reflects a recurring American discomfort: we celebrate plenty as proof of virtue, yet we treat poverty as personal misfortune. Reagan flips that script for a moment. The rhetorical power comes from its simplicity: it makes “still starving” feel like an ongoing scandal, not a sad footnote, and it does so in the plain language of a leader who understood television-era persuasion.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Ronald
Add to List
