"It's easy to focus on the things that divide us. Sometimes too easy"
About this Quote
“It’s easy” is doing the real political work here: it lowers the bar so far that division starts to look less like an ideology and more like a bad habit. Dan Miller’s line doesn’t thunder about unity; it shrugs at polarization as the path of least resistance. That’s smart rhetoric for a working politician because it dodges the usual finger-pointing. No villains, no party labels, no moral lecture. Just a quiet indictment of our default settings.
The second sentence, “Sometimes too easy,” is the pivot from observation to warning. It implies that division isn’t merely common; it’s suspiciously convenient. “Too easy” carries the subtext of manipulation: incentives, media cycles, fundraising, and algorithmic outrage all make conflict effortless and profitable. Miller doesn’t need to name these forces; the listener supplies them. That’s how the line recruits agreement across factions without demanding anyone confess guilt.
Contextually, this sounds designed for a moment when civic trust is brittle and every issue is framed as a zero-sum identity test. The phrasing also reads like a preface to policy compromise: if dividing is “easy,” then bridging differences becomes a deliberate act of effort, discipline, even courage. He’s positioning unity not as sentimentality but as work - and setting up anyone who refuses that work as someone taking the lazy route. That’s a gentle frame with a hard edge.
The second sentence, “Sometimes too easy,” is the pivot from observation to warning. It implies that division isn’t merely common; it’s suspiciously convenient. “Too easy” carries the subtext of manipulation: incentives, media cycles, fundraising, and algorithmic outrage all make conflict effortless and profitable. Miller doesn’t need to name these forces; the listener supplies them. That’s how the line recruits agreement across factions without demanding anyone confess guilt.
Contextually, this sounds designed for a moment when civic trust is brittle and every issue is framed as a zero-sum identity test. The phrasing also reads like a preface to policy compromise: if dividing is “easy,” then bridging differences becomes a deliberate act of effort, discipline, even courage. He’s positioning unity not as sentimentality but as work - and setting up anyone who refuses that work as someone taking the lazy route. That’s a gentle frame with a hard edge.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Dan
Add to List





