"It's hard to know now who, if anyone, in the media has any credibility"
About this Quote
Fineman’s line lands like a weary admission from inside the machine, not a cheap shot from outside it. “It’s hard to know now” does the crucial work: it frames the crisis as epistemic before it’s moral. The problem isn’t only that some outlets get things wrong; it’s that the ordinary cues people used to sort reliable reporting from noise no longer feel dependable. “Who, if anyone” is the sting. He’s not merely pointing at a few bad actors; he’s conceding that the category “the media” itself has become suspect in the public mind, a collapsed umbrella under which serious investigative work and performance outrage get lumped together.
The subtext is institutional self-indictment with a dash of fatalism. Credibility isn’t presented as something journalists can simply assert through branding or tone; it’s a relationship, built over time, that can be squandered quickly and repaired only slowly. Fineman’s choice to say “in the media” rather than naming platforms hints at a system-level rot: the incentives that reward speed over verification, hot takes over reporting, tribal alignment over complexity. He’s also gesturing at the weaponization of distrust: political actors and partisan ecosystems have made “media” a catch-all villain, so even accurate stories can arrive pre-stamped as propaganda.
Context matters because this kind of sentence tends to surface in moments when the press is simultaneously more necessary and more doubted - after major misinformation waves, high-profile corrections, or sustained attacks on journalists’ legitimacy. It’s less a declaration of surrender than a bleak map of the terrain: authority is no longer assumed, and the burden of proof resets every day.
The subtext is institutional self-indictment with a dash of fatalism. Credibility isn’t presented as something journalists can simply assert through branding or tone; it’s a relationship, built over time, that can be squandered quickly and repaired only slowly. Fineman’s choice to say “in the media” rather than naming platforms hints at a system-level rot: the incentives that reward speed over verification, hot takes over reporting, tribal alignment over complexity. He’s also gesturing at the weaponization of distrust: political actors and partisan ecosystems have made “media” a catch-all villain, so even accurate stories can arrive pre-stamped as propaganda.
Context matters because this kind of sentence tends to surface in moments when the press is simultaneously more necessary and more doubted - after major misinformation waves, high-profile corrections, or sustained attacks on journalists’ legitimacy. It’s less a declaration of surrender than a bleak map of the terrain: authority is no longer assumed, and the burden of proof resets every day.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Howard
Add to List




