"It's indeed surprising that replacing the elementary particle with a string leads to such a big change in things. I'm tempted to say that it has to do with the fuzziness it introduces"
About this Quote
A throwaway “it’s surprising” from Edward Witten is never just surprise; it’s a controlled way of pointing at a conceptual fault line. The line lands because it underplays what string theory dares to do: swap the clean, idealized point-particle (the minimalist atom of quantum field theory) for an extended object, then watch whole categories of problems reshape themselves. Witten’s voice is characteristically spare, almost casual, but the subtext is audacious: tiny changes in ontology can rewire the mathematics of reality.
“Replacing the elementary particle with a string” isn’t a cosmetic upgrade. A point has no internal scale; it invites infinities when interactions probe arbitrarily short distances. A string, by contrast, has length, vibration, and thus a built-in “smearing” of interactions. Calling it “fuzziness” is Witten’s deliberately human word for a technical fact: extendedness acts like a regulator, softening the ultraviolet catastrophes that haunt point-like theories. The “big change” is less about adding a new object than about changing what it even means to collide, to localize, to ask a question at zero distance.
The “I’m tempted to say” matters, too. It signals intellectual modesty while nudging the reader toward an explanatory style that string theory often resists: no single mechanism, just a network of consequences (dualities, new symmetries, unexpected links to geometry) that make the theory feel less like an invention and more like a discovery. Witten is hinting that physics sometimes advances by accepting blur where we demanded precision, and finding that the blur is not ignorance but structure.
“Replacing the elementary particle with a string” isn’t a cosmetic upgrade. A point has no internal scale; it invites infinities when interactions probe arbitrarily short distances. A string, by contrast, has length, vibration, and thus a built-in “smearing” of interactions. Calling it “fuzziness” is Witten’s deliberately human word for a technical fact: extendedness acts like a regulator, softening the ultraviolet catastrophes that haunt point-like theories. The “big change” is less about adding a new object than about changing what it even means to collide, to localize, to ask a question at zero distance.
The “I’m tempted to say” matters, too. It signals intellectual modesty while nudging the reader toward an explanatory style that string theory often resists: no single mechanism, just a network of consequences (dualities, new symmetries, unexpected links to geometry) that make the theory feel less like an invention and more like a discovery. Witten is hinting that physics sometimes advances by accepting blur where we demanded precision, and finding that the blur is not ignorance but structure.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Edward
Add to List
