"It's not fair that there aren't very many juicy or varied roles for women"
About this Quote
Arquette’s line lands like an offhand complaint and a quiet indictment, which is exactly why it sticks. “It’s not fair” is deliberately plainspoken, almost childlike, and that simplicity does two things at once: it refuses to dress up the problem in industry euphemisms, and it frames sexism as something basic enough to be legible to anyone, not just insiders. She’s not arguing about taste or trends. She’s calling out a rigged system.
The phrase “juicy or varied” is the giveaway. She’s not asking for more roles in the abstract; she’s naming the kind of work that builds careers and cultural memory: characters with appetites, contradictions, danger, range. “Juicy” implies agency and interior life; “varied” implies a career arc that doesn’t collapse once a woman hits a certain age or steps outside a narrow type. Subtext: men get to be complicated by default, while women are often cast as functions - girlfriend, mother, victim, prize, moral compass.
As an actress speaking from inside the machine, Arquette’s critique carries a pragmatic edge: fewer textured parts means fewer chances to take risks, win awards, be taken seriously, or simply stay employed without self-erasure. There’s also a strategic modesty here. She doesn’t posture as a theorist; she speaks as a worker describing the available materials. That choice makes the accusation harder to dismiss. If even the people paid to embody these stories are bored by what’s on offer, the problem isn’t talent. It’s imagination, gatekeeping, and who gets assumed to be “the audience.”
The phrase “juicy or varied” is the giveaway. She’s not asking for more roles in the abstract; she’s naming the kind of work that builds careers and cultural memory: characters with appetites, contradictions, danger, range. “Juicy” implies agency and interior life; “varied” implies a career arc that doesn’t collapse once a woman hits a certain age or steps outside a narrow type. Subtext: men get to be complicated by default, while women are often cast as functions - girlfriend, mother, victim, prize, moral compass.
As an actress speaking from inside the machine, Arquette’s critique carries a pragmatic edge: fewer textured parts means fewer chances to take risks, win awards, be taken seriously, or simply stay employed without self-erasure. There’s also a strategic modesty here. She doesn’t posture as a theorist; she speaks as a worker describing the available materials. That choice makes the accusation harder to dismiss. If even the people paid to embody these stories are bored by what’s on offer, the problem isn’t talent. It’s imagination, gatekeeping, and who gets assumed to be “the audience.”
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Rosanna
Add to List





