"It's not just spending, it's not just taxes, it's not just corruption, it is progressivism, and it is in both parties. It is in the Republicans and the Democrats"
About this Quote
Beck’s sentence is built like a prosecutor’s closing argument: clear the minor charges off the table so the jury focuses on the felony. “It’s not just spending… not just taxes… not just corruption” performs a deliberate escalation. Each item is a familiar conservative grievance, but he treats them as symptoms, not the disease. The pivot word, “progressivism,” is the diagnostic label that converts scattered policy complaints into a single ideological culprit. That move is the point: it turns politics from a debate over budgets and ethics into a battle over identity and worldview.
The line’s real work happens in the second half. “It is in both parties” isn’t a bipartisan olive branch; it’s an act of delegitimization. By casting progressivism as an invasive force inside Republicans as well as Democrats, Beck licenses distrust of establishment conservatives, compromise, and technocratic governance. The subtext is that voting “red” isn’t enough if the movement itself has been captured. It’s a pitch for insurgency: primary your own side, build parallel institutions, treat moderation as contamination.
Context matters. Beck rose during the late-2000s backlash to bailouts, Obama-era stimulus, and the Tea Party’s anti-establishment energy. “Progressivism” here functions less as a precise doctrine than as a catch-all for elite management, bureaucracy, and cultural liberalism. The genius and the danger of the framing is its elasticity: if the enemy is everywhere, any setback can be explained as sabotage from within, and any policy disagreement becomes evidence of ideological infection.
The line’s real work happens in the second half. “It is in both parties” isn’t a bipartisan olive branch; it’s an act of delegitimization. By casting progressivism as an invasive force inside Republicans as well as Democrats, Beck licenses distrust of establishment conservatives, compromise, and technocratic governance. The subtext is that voting “red” isn’t enough if the movement itself has been captured. It’s a pitch for insurgency: primary your own side, build parallel institutions, treat moderation as contamination.
Context matters. Beck rose during the late-2000s backlash to bailouts, Obama-era stimulus, and the Tea Party’s anti-establishment energy. “Progressivism” here functions less as a precise doctrine than as a catch-all for elite management, bureaucracy, and cultural liberalism. The genius and the danger of the framing is its elasticity: if the enemy is everywhere, any setback can be explained as sabotage from within, and any policy disagreement becomes evidence of ideological infection.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Glenn
Add to List



