"It's not the case that carbon dioxide drives temperatures. When you leave Ice Ages, it's the other way around: The temperatures go up first, and then carbon dioxide levels go up"
About this Quote
Corbyn’s line is engineered to sound like a quiet correction of climate “groupthink”: a tidy reversal (“the other way around”) that turns a complex feedback loop into a courtroom gotcha. The specific intent isn’t to map the full carbon cycle across glacial transitions; it’s to delegitimize the headline claim that CO2 is a primary driver of modern warming by leaning on a true-but-incomplete paleoclimate detail: during past deglaciations, temperature in some records rises before atmospheric CO2, because initial warming is kicked off by orbital changes and then amplified as oceans release CO2.
The subtext is rhetorical judo. By framing the sequence as proof of non-causation, he invites the audience to treat “CO2 follows temperature” as a universal rule rather than a conditional finding tied to a particular trigger. It’s a move designed to swap scientific nuance for common-sense causality: if A comes first, A must be the cause; if B comes later, B is just an effect. That’s persuasive in a soundbite culture because it mimics how we reason about everyday events, not how interacting climate forcings and feedbacks behave.
Context matters: in contemporary climate debates, this talking point functions less as a research claim than as a cudgel against policy urgency. It weaponizes temporal lag to imply irrelevance, while sidestepping the central modern distinction: today, CO2 is being forced upward first by fossil fuel combustion, and physics links higher CO2 to added heat-trapping regardless of what happened in Ice Age exits. The quote works because it feels like insider skepticism, delivered as a simple timeline.
The subtext is rhetorical judo. By framing the sequence as proof of non-causation, he invites the audience to treat “CO2 follows temperature” as a universal rule rather than a conditional finding tied to a particular trigger. It’s a move designed to swap scientific nuance for common-sense causality: if A comes first, A must be the cause; if B comes later, B is just an effect. That’s persuasive in a soundbite culture because it mimics how we reason about everyday events, not how interacting climate forcings and feedbacks behave.
Context matters: in contemporary climate debates, this talking point functions less as a research claim than as a cudgel against policy urgency. It weaponizes temporal lag to imply irrelevance, while sidestepping the central modern distinction: today, CO2 is being forced upward first by fossil fuel combustion, and physics links higher CO2 to added heat-trapping regardless of what happened in Ice Age exits. The quote works because it feels like insider skepticism, delivered as a simple timeline.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Piers
Add to List


