"Its not what man Does which exalts him, but what man Would do"
About this Quote
Ambition is the polite word for it; moral imagination is the sharper one. When Robert Browning Hamilton argues that a man is exalted not by what he does but by what he would do, he’s sneaking past the usual scoreboard of achievement and into the private arena where character actually forms: intention under pressure, restraint when no one is watching, courage that never gets the chance to become a headline.
The line works because it flatters and indicts at once. It rescues the “ordinary” person from the tyranny of outcomes - the poor, the unlucky, the uncredentialed - by suggesting that circumstance is a bad judge of worth. You can be hemmed in by class, illness, war, family duty, or plain bad timing and still possess the internal architecture of a hero. At the same time, it quietly undermines the successful: if your good deeds are convenient, rewarded, or accidental, they don’t necessarily testify to greatness. Exaltation, here, is less about public virtue than about the counterfactual: What would you do if the cost were real?
Hamilton wrote across a period obsessed with respectability, social rank, and the moral theater of empire. Against that backdrop, the quote reads like a rebuttal to Victorian moral accounting: the idea that righteousness can be tallied in visible acts. The subtext is almost modern: outcomes are noisy; incentives distort behavior; the cleanest evidence of ethics is often hypothetical, internal, and therefore hard to commodify. It’s also a warning about self-mythology. “Would do” can be noble resolve - or a comforting fantasy. The quote dares you to prove which.
The line works because it flatters and indicts at once. It rescues the “ordinary” person from the tyranny of outcomes - the poor, the unlucky, the uncredentialed - by suggesting that circumstance is a bad judge of worth. You can be hemmed in by class, illness, war, family duty, or plain bad timing and still possess the internal architecture of a hero. At the same time, it quietly undermines the successful: if your good deeds are convenient, rewarded, or accidental, they don’t necessarily testify to greatness. Exaltation, here, is less about public virtue than about the counterfactual: What would you do if the cost were real?
Hamilton wrote across a period obsessed with respectability, social rank, and the moral theater of empire. Against that backdrop, the quote reads like a rebuttal to Victorian moral accounting: the idea that righteousness can be tallied in visible acts. The subtext is almost modern: outcomes are noisy; incentives distort behavior; the cleanest evidence of ethics is often hypothetical, internal, and therefore hard to commodify. It’s also a warning about self-mythology. “Would do” can be noble resolve - or a comforting fantasy. The quote dares you to prove which.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List
