"It's the perfect definition of a settlement. Both parties didn't get what they wanted!"
About this Quote
The wit is in the inversion of “perfect.” Perfection usually signals optimal outcomes, clarity, closure. Geffen uses it to describe a messy middle where neither side gets to feel righteous. That’s the subtext: the best you can hope for in high-stakes conflict is a deal that nobody can brag about. The ego is managed, not satisfied.
Context matters, too. In entertainment and big business, disputes are rarely just about money. They’re about precedent, reputation, and who gets to look dominant. A settlement protects faces while quietly acknowledging uncertainty: the facts might be ambiguous, the trial risk intolerable, the publicity damaging. Geffen’s definition also flatters the pragmatist. It frames compromise not as weakness but as competence - an ability to accept imperfect outcomes before the fight starts costing more than it’s worth.
Underneath the quip sits a worldview: conflict is permanent, fairness is negotiable, and the closest thing to justice is a contract both sides can live with, begrudgingly.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Geffen, David. (2026, February 19). It's the perfect definition of a settlement. Both parties didn't get what they wanted! FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/its-the-perfect-definition-of-a-settlement-both-50976/
Chicago Style
Geffen, David. "It's the perfect definition of a settlement. Both parties didn't get what they wanted!" FixQuotes. February 19, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/its-the-perfect-definition-of-a-settlement-both-50976/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"It's the perfect definition of a settlement. Both parties didn't get what they wanted!" FixQuotes, 19 Feb. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/its-the-perfect-definition-of-a-settlement-both-50976/. Accessed 21 Feb. 2026.







