"It's the tyranny of an oligarchy that I'm concerned about"
About this Quote
Pat Robertson’s line is doing double duty: it sounds like a civics lecture, but it’s really a warning flare shot from inside America’s culture wars. “Tyranny” is the key emotional trigger word, borrowed from the country’s revolutionary mythology. Pair it with “oligarchy” and you get a villain that feels both un-American and plausibly real: rule by a small, self-interested few. The phrase is broad enough to fit whatever audience fear is currently hot - coastal elites, judges, bureaucrats, media executives, billionaire donors - while still letting Robertson claim he’s defending democracy, not attacking it.
The subtext is strategic. By framing his concern as oligarchic “tyranny,” Robertson shifts attention away from majoritarian politics (where his movement often sought to wield electoral power) to the suspicion that outcomes are being engineered above voters’ heads. It’s a rhetorical move that pre-legitimizes resistance: if you’re under “tyranny,” you’re not being oppositional, you’re being patriotic. It also launders a particular religious-political agenda through the language of constitutional anxiety, making a sectarian grievance sound like a neutral defense of freedom.
Context matters: Robertson built influence by translating evangelical certainty into broadcast politics, especially from the late Cold War through the rise of the Religious Right. In that ecosystem, “oligarchy” isn’t a policy diagnosis as much as a moral accusation: the sense that a decadent, unaccountable class is rewriting the rules, and that believers are the ones being ruled rather than represented.
The subtext is strategic. By framing his concern as oligarchic “tyranny,” Robertson shifts attention away from majoritarian politics (where his movement often sought to wield electoral power) to the suspicion that outcomes are being engineered above voters’ heads. It’s a rhetorical move that pre-legitimizes resistance: if you’re under “tyranny,” you’re not being oppositional, you’re being patriotic. It also launders a particular religious-political agenda through the language of constitutional anxiety, making a sectarian grievance sound like a neutral defense of freedom.
Context matters: Robertson built influence by translating evangelical certainty into broadcast politics, especially from the late Cold War through the rise of the Religious Right. In that ecosystem, “oligarchy” isn’t a policy diagnosis as much as a moral accusation: the sense that a decadent, unaccountable class is rewriting the rules, and that believers are the ones being ruled rather than represented.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Pat
Add to List







