"It's up to history to judge"
About this Quote
Its up to history to judge is the kind of sentence that pretends to be humble while quietly ducking the courtroom. In Pol Pots mouth, it functions less as reflection than as insulation: a way to shove responsibility into a foggy future where paperwork decays, witnesses die, and the living urgency of accountability gets reframed as debate.
The line borrows the prestige of historical distance. History, as invoked here, sounds like an impartial tribunal: sober, balanced, above emotion. Thats the rhetorical trick. By appealing to history, Pol Pot tries to launder mass violence into the category of contested legacy, as if the Khmer Rouge years were a complicated policy experiment rather than a catastrophe measured in emptied cities, forced labor, famine, and organized killing. The phrasing turns crimes into a narrative problem: not Did this happen? or Who ordered it? but How will people interpret it later?
Theres also a cynical wager embedded in the sentence: that time dilutes moral clarity. Dictators often lean on the myth that outcomes justify methods and that national trauma can be repackaged as necessary hardship. For Pol Pot, who spent years denying or minimizing the scale of atrocities, the appeal to history is a final maneuver in that same strategy: to trade evidence for ambiguity.
It lands with extra chill because it shifts the burden onto posterity, asking the future to perform the justice the present was denied. In places where survivors are still alive, thats not philosophy. Its evasion wearing a statesmans mask.
The line borrows the prestige of historical distance. History, as invoked here, sounds like an impartial tribunal: sober, balanced, above emotion. Thats the rhetorical trick. By appealing to history, Pol Pot tries to launder mass violence into the category of contested legacy, as if the Khmer Rouge years were a complicated policy experiment rather than a catastrophe measured in emptied cities, forced labor, famine, and organized killing. The phrasing turns crimes into a narrative problem: not Did this happen? or Who ordered it? but How will people interpret it later?
Theres also a cynical wager embedded in the sentence: that time dilutes moral clarity. Dictators often lean on the myth that outcomes justify methods and that national trauma can be repackaged as necessary hardship. For Pol Pot, who spent years denying or minimizing the scale of atrocities, the appeal to history is a final maneuver in that same strategy: to trade evidence for ambiguity.
It lands with extra chill because it shifts the burden onto posterity, asking the future to perform the justice the present was denied. In places where survivors are still alive, thats not philosophy. Its evasion wearing a statesmans mask.
Quote Details
| Topic | Legacy & Remembrance |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Pol
Add to List











