"I've always been driven by the concept of equal justice under the law, but only the rich can pay great sums of money for legal assistance and that puts them at an advantage over the poor"
About this Quote
Equal justice under the law is the kind of civic slogan that sounds airtight until you watch it collide with invoices. Samuel Dash, a lawyer who spent his career inside the machinery of American justice, isn’t rejecting the ideal so much as indicting the marketplace that quietly governs its execution. The line’s power comes from the tension between constitutional poetry and procedural reality: rights may be equal on paper, but outcomes are often priced.
Dash’s phrasing does a neat rhetorical move. He begins with an almost reverent declaration of purpose, “driven by the concept,” establishing moral credibility and professional faith. Then he pivots with the blunt “but,” turning the statement into a cross-examination. The subtext is that inequality isn’t merely a social condition; it’s baked into the adversarial system itself. If law is a contest of facts, motions, experts, investigation, time, and strategic patience, money doesn’t just buy “assistance.” It buys bandwidth. It buys error-correction. It buys the ability to drag a case out until the other side can’t afford to keep breathing.
Context matters: Dash lived through the postwar expansion of rights talk alongside the privatization and professionalization of legal combat. Even landmark promises like Gideon’s right to counsel can feel hollow when public defenders are overloaded and prosecutors have institutional resources. Dash is pointing at a structural contradiction: a democracy that markets justice like a luxury good, then acts surprised when the poor experience the law less as protection than as pressure.
It’s not a cynical throwaway. It’s a warning from someone who knows where the levers are.
Dash’s phrasing does a neat rhetorical move. He begins with an almost reverent declaration of purpose, “driven by the concept,” establishing moral credibility and professional faith. Then he pivots with the blunt “but,” turning the statement into a cross-examination. The subtext is that inequality isn’t merely a social condition; it’s baked into the adversarial system itself. If law is a contest of facts, motions, experts, investigation, time, and strategic patience, money doesn’t just buy “assistance.” It buys bandwidth. It buys error-correction. It buys the ability to drag a case out until the other side can’t afford to keep breathing.
Context matters: Dash lived through the postwar expansion of rights talk alongside the privatization and professionalization of legal combat. Even landmark promises like Gideon’s right to counsel can feel hollow when public defenders are overloaded and prosecutors have institutional resources. Dash is pointing at a structural contradiction: a democracy that markets justice like a luxury good, then acts surprised when the poor experience the law less as protection than as pressure.
It’s not a cynical throwaway. It’s a warning from someone who knows where the levers are.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Samuel
Add to List




