"I've been asked about this constantly, and I compare it to how if you're walking down the street and some schizo guy comes up to you and vomits on you: You wouldn't be hurt by that, you'd just think it's weird"
About this Quote
Klosterman reaches for an ugly image because he’s talking about an uglier social reflex: the way public attention treats other people’s opinions as contagious. The setup is almost throwaway conversational, then it swerves into a blunt, borderline offensive street-scene metaphor. That’s the point. He’s trying to short-circuit the dignifying language we usually give to criticism, controversy, or “being asked constantly.” By likening it to a random stranger vomiting on you, he demotes the whole experience from meaningful harm to irrational spectacle.
The intent is defensive, but not in the usual celebrity way. He’s not insisting he’s above it; he’s insisting it’s not about him at all. Vomit isn’t a coherent argument, it’s an involuntary discharge. In his framing, certain questions and outrage cycles aren’t critiques to be “engaged,” they’re noise produced by someone else’s condition - the culture’s compulsion, the interviewer’s itch, the audience’s need to process anxiety by projecting it onto a target. The “you wouldn’t be hurt” line is a tight inversion of how reputational damage is supposed to work: the stain looks real, but the injury is mostly social theater.
Context matters because Klosterman is a critic who lives inside media loops. He’s describing the mechanics of constant commentary: repetition creates the illusion of significance. The provocation (“schizo guy”) also reveals his own era’s casualness around mental health language, which undercuts his moral authority even as it sharpens the cynicism. The line works because it’s vivid, unflattering, and clarifying: not all attention is a referendum; sometimes it’s just somebody else making a mess in public.
The intent is defensive, but not in the usual celebrity way. He’s not insisting he’s above it; he’s insisting it’s not about him at all. Vomit isn’t a coherent argument, it’s an involuntary discharge. In his framing, certain questions and outrage cycles aren’t critiques to be “engaged,” they’re noise produced by someone else’s condition - the culture’s compulsion, the interviewer’s itch, the audience’s need to process anxiety by projecting it onto a target. The “you wouldn’t be hurt” line is a tight inversion of how reputational damage is supposed to work: the stain looks real, but the injury is mostly social theater.
Context matters because Klosterman is a critic who lives inside media loops. He’s describing the mechanics of constant commentary: repetition creates the illusion of significance. The provocation (“schizo guy”) also reveals his own era’s casualness around mental health language, which undercuts his moral authority even as it sharpens the cynicism. The line works because it’s vivid, unflattering, and clarifying: not all attention is a referendum; sometimes it’s just somebody else making a mess in public.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sarcastic |
|---|
More Quotes by Chuck
Add to List


