"I've been interested in watching the level of conservative misinformation that circulates through the media"
About this Quote
A faintly clinical phrase like "I've been interested in watching" does a lot of work here: it frames conservative misinformation not as a partisan food fight but as an observable phenomenon, something you can track like weather patterns or an outbreak. David Brock is signaling posture before argument. He casts himself as the watcher, the recorder, the person in the room who kept receipts while everyone else yelled.
The real charge lands in the middle: "the level". Brock isn't alleging a one-off lie or a sloppy segment; he's implying volume, intensity, and escalation. That word smuggles in a story of accumulation: repetition across outlets, amplification through talking points, and a feedback loop where the media doesn't simply report politics but manufactures the conditions for it. "Circulates" is equally loaded. Misinformation is treated like a contaminant moving through a system, not a set of discrete bad actors. The culprit isn't just a pundit; it's distribution.
Context matters because Brock's public identity is inseparable from the conservative-to-liberal conversion narrative and his later role building institutional counterpower (Media Matters). That biography turns the line into both warning and credential. He isn't merely accusing; he's testifying as an ex-insider who learned how the pipeline works. Subtext: if you think this is just "bias", you're missing the architecture. The intent is to shift the debate from isolated "gotchas" to infrastructure: incentives, echo chambers, and the strategic value of confusion.
The real charge lands in the middle: "the level". Brock isn't alleging a one-off lie or a sloppy segment; he's implying volume, intensity, and escalation. That word smuggles in a story of accumulation: repetition across outlets, amplification through talking points, and a feedback loop where the media doesn't simply report politics but manufactures the conditions for it. "Circulates" is equally loaded. Misinformation is treated like a contaminant moving through a system, not a set of discrete bad actors. The culprit isn't just a pundit; it's distribution.
Context matters because Brock's public identity is inseparable from the conservative-to-liberal conversion narrative and his later role building institutional counterpower (Media Matters). That biography turns the line into both warning and credential. He isn't merely accusing; he's testifying as an ex-insider who learned how the pipeline works. Subtext: if you think this is just "bias", you're missing the architecture. The intent is to shift the debate from isolated "gotchas" to infrastructure: incentives, echo chambers, and the strategic value of confusion.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|
More Quotes by David
Add to List




