"I've been saying in the press that being a NY Post investigator reporter is an oxymoron"

In evaluating Joe Pantoliano's quote, "I've been stating in journalism that being a NY Post investigative press reporter is an oxymoron", we can unload numerous layers of meaning and review about journalism, particularly worrying the New york city Post.

Firstly, the term "oxymoron" describes a figure of speech where contradictory terms are combined. By stating that being an investigative reporter for the New York Post is an oxymoron, Pantoliano suggests that the 2 principles-- the quality of being investigative and the journalistic practices of the New York Post-- are inherently inconsistent. This assertion suggests skepticism about the depth and rigor of investigative journalism as it is carried out by this particular paper.

The New York Post is understood for its sensationalist design and often prioritizes captivating headlines and stories that interest mass-market audiences. Critics frequently argue that such a technique can weaken the kind of extensive, unbiased examination that is the trademark of excellent investigative reporting. Investigative journalism usually involves detailed and thorough research to uncover reality, typically about major or intricate issues, which is then provided objectively. Pantoliano's declaration seems to slam the New York Post for lacking these qualities.

Additionally, the quote can be viewed as a commentary on the more comprehensive media landscape. It reflects concerns about the decline of major journalism in favor of more superficial, entertainment-focused reporting. This transition can feed public mistrust in media organizations, as the line in between reality and entertainment becomes blurred. When investigative journalism, which is supposed to hold power accountable, is perceived as superficial or biased, it can have substantial implications for public discourse and democracy.

Pantoliano's quote, therefore, functions as both a critique of the New York Post and a cautionary reflection on the state of contemporary journalism. It challenges readers to think about the value of reputable investigative work and to be vital of the sources from which they take in news.