"I've found that the more experts you have on a movie, the less control the director has"
About this Quote
The intent is practical and political. Frankenheimer came up in an era when directors were expected to make hard calls on set, under pressure, with imperfect information. His films (from The Manchurian Candidate to Seconds) carry a kind of controlled paranoia; they’re built on tone and point of view. Those are precisely the first casualties when decision-making migrates to panels of “expertise” whose incentives aren’t aesthetic unity but risk management: avoid offending, avoid failing, avoid surprise.
The subtext is also about accountability. A director with control can be wrong, but the work has a spine. Add experts and you get plausible deniability: if a film turns bland, no single person “did” it. Frankenheimer’s jab lands because it exposes how expertise can become a bureaucratic alibi, turning filmmaking from decisive storytelling into consensus engineering.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Frankenheimer, John. (2026, January 16). I've found that the more experts you have on a movie, the less control the director has. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/ive-found-that-the-more-experts-you-have-on-a-98358/
Chicago Style
Frankenheimer, John. "I've found that the more experts you have on a movie, the less control the director has." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/ive-found-that-the-more-experts-you-have-on-a-98358/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"I've found that the more experts you have on a movie, the less control the director has." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/ive-found-that-the-more-experts-you-have-on-a-98358/. Accessed 5 Feb. 2026.


