"I've often talked about that, and I've been asked that a couple of times and my feeling are that if you have a good show, a bad host will not even hurt the show"
About this Quote
There is a quietly radical confidence baked into Wink Martindale's claim: the host is, at best, a vehicle. Coming from a career built on being that vehicle, the line lands like a seasoned pro refusing the cult of personality that TV so often demands. He’s saying the game is the star, not the ringmaster.
The intent is pragmatic, almost producer-minded. Martindale is answering a question about the “importance” of the host, and he sidesteps ego in favor of format. A “good show” has mechanics that generate momentum on their own: clear rules, escalating stakes, contestants who pop, prizes that feel legible to the audience, and a rhythm that makes you play along from the couch. If those parts are engineered well, the host becomes an amplifier, not a load-bearing wall.
The subtext is sharper: audiences forgive a lot when the underlying machine works. A host can be stiff, corny, even mildly irritating, and the show can still hum because the pleasure isn’t really the host’s charm; it’s the suspense of outcomes and the satisfaction of structure. That’s a veteran’s view of entertainment as craft, not mystique.
Context matters, too. Classic game shows were built for syndication and repeatability, designed to be resilient across episodes, networks, and eras. Martindale, speaking as someone who’s seen formats outlive faces, is quietly defending the invisible labor of good television: writing, pacing, casting, and rules that don’t collapse under scrutiny. In a media culture obsessed with “hosts as brands,” it’s an old-school reminder that charisma can decorate a strong chassis, but it can’t replace one.
The intent is pragmatic, almost producer-minded. Martindale is answering a question about the “importance” of the host, and he sidesteps ego in favor of format. A “good show” has mechanics that generate momentum on their own: clear rules, escalating stakes, contestants who pop, prizes that feel legible to the audience, and a rhythm that makes you play along from the couch. If those parts are engineered well, the host becomes an amplifier, not a load-bearing wall.
The subtext is sharper: audiences forgive a lot when the underlying machine works. A host can be stiff, corny, even mildly irritating, and the show can still hum because the pleasure isn’t really the host’s charm; it’s the suspense of outcomes and the satisfaction of structure. That’s a veteran’s view of entertainment as craft, not mystique.
Context matters, too. Classic game shows were built for syndication and repeatability, designed to be resilient across episodes, networks, and eras. Martindale, speaking as someone who’s seen formats outlive faces, is quietly defending the invisible labor of good television: writing, pacing, casting, and rules that don’t collapse under scrutiny. In a media culture obsessed with “hosts as brands,” it’s an old-school reminder that charisma can decorate a strong chassis, but it can’t replace one.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Wink
Add to List
