"I've thought a lot about the world and how George Bush sees the world and it ain't even close"
About this Quote
The line lands like a blunt instrument, and that is the point. Gephardt is not offering a policy brief; he is staging a contrast in worldview, the kind that voters can feel even if they can’t recite the platform. “I’ve thought a lot about the world” casts him as studious, reflective, the guy doing the homework. It’s a politician’s shorthand for seriousness without the burden of specifics. Then comes the turn: “and how George Bush sees the world.” He’s not debating Bush’s proposals so much as Bush’s perception - the mental map behind the decisions. That’s a deeper charge: the problem isn’t one bad call, it’s the operating system.
The grammar does extra work. “It ain’t even close” is deliberately unbuttoned, a barroom cadence in place of Senate-speak. Gephardt is signaling solidarity with ordinary skepticism, trying to puncture the aura of presidential certainty with a phrase that sounds like sports trash talk. It frames leadership as a contest with a clear winner, not a nuanced disagreement among elites.
Contextually, this is early-2000s Democratic positioning against a Bush foreign-policy posture defined by moral clarity, unilateral instincts, and post-9/11 swagger. Gephardt’s subtext is caution: Bush’s lens is too simple, too rigid, too confident for a complicated world. It’s also a preemptive defense against the “soft” label - he’s not timid, he’s discerning. The sentence’s power comes from its intimacy: not “Bush is wrong,” but “I’ve looked at his mind, and I’m not buying it.”
The grammar does extra work. “It ain’t even close” is deliberately unbuttoned, a barroom cadence in place of Senate-speak. Gephardt is signaling solidarity with ordinary skepticism, trying to puncture the aura of presidential certainty with a phrase that sounds like sports trash talk. It frames leadership as a contest with a clear winner, not a nuanced disagreement among elites.
Contextually, this is early-2000s Democratic positioning against a Bush foreign-policy posture defined by moral clarity, unilateral instincts, and post-9/11 swagger. Gephardt’s subtext is caution: Bush’s lens is too simple, too rigid, too confident for a complicated world. It’s also a preemptive defense against the “soft” label - he’s not timid, he’s discerning. The sentence’s power comes from its intimacy: not “Bush is wrong,” but “I’ve looked at his mind, and I’m not buying it.”
Quote Details
| Topic | Sarcastic |
|---|
More Quotes by Dick
Add to List




