"I've waffled before. I'll waffle again"
About this Quote
A politician admitting he’ll “waffle” isn’t a confession so much as a preemptive strike. Howard Dean takes one of campaign culture’s favorite insults - the idea that changing your mind is moral weakness - and flips it into a kind of plainspoken defiance. The rhythm is almost comic: short sentences, blunt repetition, a shrug turned into a soundbite. He’s not pleading for forgiveness; he’s daring you to pretend you’ve never revised an opinion when the facts changed.
The intent is tactical honesty. Dean signals that he’s not going to perform the modern political fantasy of perfect consistency, where every position is supposedly locked in from birth and deviations are treated as betrayal. By owning the label, he drains it of its sting and reframes “waffling” as flexibility: an openness to new information, shifting coalitions, or the messy realities of governing.
The subtext is also a rebuke to the media game. “Waffler” is a headline word, a cudgel for reporters and opponents who want to convert complexity into character flaw. Dean answers in their language but refuses their premise. There’s an implied contrast with rivals who never “waffle” because they never risk specificity, or because they quietly pivot while insisting they haven’t.
Context matters: Dean rose in an era when soundbites and “flip-flop” narratives hardened into political weaponry. His line is a small act of rhetorical jiu-jitsu - not glamorous, but revealing. It asks voters to choose between two kinds of leadership: the one that changes with the world and admits it, and the one that changes anyway but lies about it.
The intent is tactical honesty. Dean signals that he’s not going to perform the modern political fantasy of perfect consistency, where every position is supposedly locked in from birth and deviations are treated as betrayal. By owning the label, he drains it of its sting and reframes “waffling” as flexibility: an openness to new information, shifting coalitions, or the messy realities of governing.
The subtext is also a rebuke to the media game. “Waffler” is a headline word, a cudgel for reporters and opponents who want to convert complexity into character flaw. Dean answers in their language but refuses their premise. There’s an implied contrast with rivals who never “waffle” because they never risk specificity, or because they quietly pivot while insisting they haven’t.
Context matters: Dean rose in an era when soundbites and “flip-flop” narratives hardened into political weaponry. His line is a small act of rhetorical jiu-jitsu - not glamorous, but revealing. It asks voters to choose between two kinds of leadership: the one that changes with the world and admits it, and the one that changes anyway but lies about it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|
More Quotes by Howard
Add to List
