"I've worked with actors before where I was like, this is not working, and then I've seen their work on the screen and I've been like, Wow, that was a really great performance. Because there are a lot of elements with film. It's not like stage. It's not a kind of performance art anymore; it's a highly tuned kind of collaboration - a symphony"
About this Quote
Kartheiser punctures one of acting culture's favorite myths: that you can reliably judge a performance in the room. His confession has the sting of professional humility, but it also smuggles in a bigger argument about authorship. On set, he’s watched an interaction feel dead, then witnessed the finished film turn it into something alive. That reversal isn’t an accident; it’s the medium doing what it does best - making truth out of fragments.
The intent is partly corrective. Stage acting flatters the idea of a continuous, self-contained performance: the actor as primary instrument, the audience as immediate feedback loop. Film dismantles that. You work out of sequence, under changing lenses, with takes engineered for coverage rather than catharsis. What feels “not working” might actually be raw material: a pause that becomes meaningful in the edit, a flat line reading that lands once paired with a reaction shot, a moment salvaged by sound design or the exact rhythm of a cut.
His subtext is also a quiet redistribution of credit. By calling filmmaking “a symphony,” he’s naming the uncomfortable truth actors don’t always like to say out loud: the director, editor, cinematographer, script supervisor, even the lighting plan can conduct your performance into coherence. The “Wow” isn’t just admiration for the other actor; it’s recognition that film can manufacture intimacy and precision through collaboration, not merely capture it.
Contextually, this reads like an actor who’s spent enough time inside the machine to stop romanticizing it. The line isn’t anti-acting; it’s pro-craft, insisting that screen work is less about individual virtuosity than about learning to trust the orchestra.
The intent is partly corrective. Stage acting flatters the idea of a continuous, self-contained performance: the actor as primary instrument, the audience as immediate feedback loop. Film dismantles that. You work out of sequence, under changing lenses, with takes engineered for coverage rather than catharsis. What feels “not working” might actually be raw material: a pause that becomes meaningful in the edit, a flat line reading that lands once paired with a reaction shot, a moment salvaged by sound design or the exact rhythm of a cut.
His subtext is also a quiet redistribution of credit. By calling filmmaking “a symphony,” he’s naming the uncomfortable truth actors don’t always like to say out loud: the director, editor, cinematographer, script supervisor, even the lighting plan can conduct your performance into coherence. The “Wow” isn’t just admiration for the other actor; it’s recognition that film can manufacture intimacy and precision through collaboration, not merely capture it.
Contextually, this reads like an actor who’s spent enough time inside the machine to stop romanticizing it. The line isn’t anti-acting; it’s pro-craft, insisting that screen work is less about individual virtuosity than about learning to trust the orchestra.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|
More Quotes by Vincent
Add to List



