"Jealousy is both reasonable and belongs to reasonable men, while envy is base and belongs to the base, for the one makes himself get good things by jealousy, while the other does not allow his neighbour to have them through envy"
About this Quote
Aristotle does something sly here: he rescues a “bad” emotion by renaming it virtue-adjacent. In modern English, jealousy and envy blur; in his moral universe they split cleanly into a socially useful spur and a corrosive sabotage. “Jealousy” (closer to emulation) is framed as reasonable because it accepts a shared standard of excellence and turns discomfort into effort. It’s competitive, but legible: I see your good, I want comparable good, so I cultivate merit. That’s not just psychology; it’s civic engineering.
The subtext is that emotions are not private storms. They are raw materials for character, and character is the infrastructure of the polis. Aristotle is writing in a culture obsessed with honor, reputation, and public standing; status isn’t merely felt, it’s performed and adjudicated. Under those conditions, a feeling that motivates self-improvement can be assimilated into “reason,” the faculty he treats as the proper ruler of the soul. Envy can’t be, because it doesn’t aim at excellence; it aims at subtraction. It’s negative-sum politics: my relative position improves only if yours worsens.
The intent, then, is classificatory and disciplinary. He’s telling “reasonable men” which rivalries are permissible and which are shameful, drawing a moral border around ambition. Admire, compete, ascend - but don’t poison the social fabric by preferring your neighbor’s loss to your own growth.
The subtext is that emotions are not private storms. They are raw materials for character, and character is the infrastructure of the polis. Aristotle is writing in a culture obsessed with honor, reputation, and public standing; status isn’t merely felt, it’s performed and adjudicated. Under those conditions, a feeling that motivates self-improvement can be assimilated into “reason,” the faculty he treats as the proper ruler of the soul. Envy can’t be, because it doesn’t aim at excellence; it aims at subtraction. It’s negative-sum politics: my relative position improves only if yours worsens.
The intent, then, is classificatory and disciplinary. He’s telling “reasonable men” which rivalries are permissible and which are shameful, drawing a moral border around ambition. Admire, compete, ascend - but don’t poison the social fabric by preferring your neighbor’s loss to your own growth.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Aristotle
Add to List





