"Judges must beware of hard constructions and strained inferences, for there is no worse torture than that of laws"
About this Quote
Bacon’s warning lands like a legal thriller in a single sentence: the real cruelty of law isn’t the penalty, it’s the interpretive contortion that gets you there. “Hard constructions and strained inferences” sounds technical, almost innocuous, but it names a familiar institutional vice: when judges stretch language to reach a desired outcome, turning statutes into instruments of pain. The torture isn’t metaphorical flourish so much as political diagnosis. A system that claims legitimacy from reason becomes monstrous the moment reasoning is forced.
The line works because it flips the usual moral hierarchy. We tend to fear tyrants with whips; Bacon points to robed arbiters with syllogisms. His subtext is skeptical, almost Machiavellian: power rarely announces itself as power. It hides in procedure, precedent, and “interpretation,” the soft vocabulary that can justify hard results. The phrase “no worse torture than that of laws” also carries an early-modern sting: torture was a real state tool in Bacon’s world, not an abstract trope. By yoking jurisprudence to torture, he implies that legal cruelty can be cleaner, quieter, and therefore more defensible.
Context matters. Bacon lived at the hinge of medieval authority and modern statecraft, helping articulate an empiricist posture in philosophy while serving a legal-political machine that prized order. This is less anti-law than anti-legalism: he’s arguing for restraint, clarity, and humility in judgment. When the text must be tortured to convict, the law has already confessed its failure.
The line works because it flips the usual moral hierarchy. We tend to fear tyrants with whips; Bacon points to robed arbiters with syllogisms. His subtext is skeptical, almost Machiavellian: power rarely announces itself as power. It hides in procedure, precedent, and “interpretation,” the soft vocabulary that can justify hard results. The phrase “no worse torture than that of laws” also carries an early-modern sting: torture was a real state tool in Bacon’s world, not an abstract trope. By yoking jurisprudence to torture, he implies that legal cruelty can be cleaner, quieter, and therefore more defensible.
Context matters. Bacon lived at the hinge of medieval authority and modern statecraft, helping articulate an empiricist posture in philosophy while serving a legal-political machine that prized order. This is less anti-law than anti-legalism: he’s arguing for restraint, clarity, and humility in judgment. When the text must be tortured to convict, the law has already confessed its failure.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Francis
Add to List
