"Just as the science and art of agriculture depend upon chemistry and botany, so the art of education depends upon physiology and psychology"
About this Quote
Thorndike is trying to smuggle education out of the realm of moral uplift and into the workshop of measurable causes. The line is engineered as an analogy with a point: nobody argues that farming can run on good intentions alone, so why should teaching? By pairing “science and art” twice, he flatters both camps at once - the empiricists who want laws and the practitioners who want craft - then quietly subordinates the craft to foundational sciences. “Art of education,” in this framing, is not inspiration; it’s applied biology and applied mind.
The subtext is a power move typical of early 20th-century psychology: make the classroom legible to the lab. Thorndike, a key architect of behaviorism and measurement in schooling, helped popularize the idea that learning could be quantified, standardized, optimized. That historical moment mattered. Mass public education was expanding, industrial management was in vogue, and “expertise” was becoming a governing style. His agriculture comparison taps that cultural faith in professionalization: the modern world runs better when specialists translate messy human activity into variables.
But the sentence also reveals its own wager. Chemistry and botany don’t just inform agriculture; they can also reduce it to inputs and yields. Thorndike implies a similar reducibility for children. The promise is efficiency and evidence-based practice; the risk is treating students as crops and teachers as technicians. The quote works because it sounds commonsensical while advancing a contested vision of what education should be: less civic ritual, more behavioral engineering.
The subtext is a power move typical of early 20th-century psychology: make the classroom legible to the lab. Thorndike, a key architect of behaviorism and measurement in schooling, helped popularize the idea that learning could be quantified, standardized, optimized. That historical moment mattered. Mass public education was expanding, industrial management was in vogue, and “expertise” was becoming a governing style. His agriculture comparison taps that cultural faith in professionalization: the modern world runs better when specialists translate messy human activity into variables.
But the sentence also reveals its own wager. Chemistry and botany don’t just inform agriculture; they can also reduce it to inputs and yields. Thorndike implies a similar reducibility for children. The promise is efficiency and evidence-based practice; the risk is treating students as crops and teachers as technicians. The quote works because it sounds commonsensical while advancing a contested vision of what education should be: less civic ritual, more behavioral engineering.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teaching |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Edward
Add to List







