"Just to stir things up seemed a great reward in itself"
About this Quote
There is a cold little thrill in Sallusts line: the idea that disorder can be its own payoff. In a culture that liked to dress ambition in the toga of virtue, he strips away the alibi. No lofty program, no public good, no tragic necessity - just the private pleasure of watching the room tilt.
Sallust is writing with a moralists eye but a politicians realism. Late Republican Rome is his backdrop: a state swollen with empire, riddled with patronage, and increasingly governed by spectacle, grievance, and competition for attention. Against that scene, stirring things up isnt merely mischief. Its a tactic. When institutions are fragile and trust is scarce, disruption becomes a shortcut to relevance. You dont have to win the argument if you can change the temperature; you dont have to build a coalition if you can break one.
The subtext is diagnostic and accusatory. Sallust suggests that certain actors are not mistaken idealists or misunderstood reformers. They are connoisseurs of instability, people who savor the churn itself - the rumors, the street energy, the procedural sabotage. It is a line that compresses a whole psychology of faction: boredom with normal politics, resentment toward hierarchy, delight in making elites react.
What makes it work is its sting of recognition. Sallust offers a motive that is uncomfortably modern: disruption as entertainment, agitation as identity, chaos as a form of power when you dont have much else.
Sallust is writing with a moralists eye but a politicians realism. Late Republican Rome is his backdrop: a state swollen with empire, riddled with patronage, and increasingly governed by spectacle, grievance, and competition for attention. Against that scene, stirring things up isnt merely mischief. Its a tactic. When institutions are fragile and trust is scarce, disruption becomes a shortcut to relevance. You dont have to win the argument if you can change the temperature; you dont have to build a coalition if you can break one.
The subtext is diagnostic and accusatory. Sallust suggests that certain actors are not mistaken idealists or misunderstood reformers. They are connoisseurs of instability, people who savor the churn itself - the rumors, the street energy, the procedural sabotage. It is a line that compresses a whole psychology of faction: boredom with normal politics, resentment toward hierarchy, delight in making elites react.
What makes it work is its sting of recognition. Sallust offers a motive that is uncomfortably modern: disruption as entertainment, agitation as identity, chaos as a form of power when you dont have much else.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by Sallust
Add to List







