"Killing more people won't help matters"
About this Quote
The intent is not to offer a policy memo. It’s to puncture the momentum that builds around militarized solutions, when “doing something” gets conflated with bombing someone. “Help matters” is deliberately domestic and almost bureaucratic; it shrinks the rhetorical theater of war down to the level of basic problem-solving, where killing is an absurd tool for fixing anything. That phrasing is a kind of political judo, using understatement to expose overreaction.
The subtext is a rebuke to a familiar story: that escalation restores order, that more death produces less danger, that violence is cleansing rather than compounding. Rankin knew how patriotism can be weaponized as a social shaming mechanism, especially against women in public life. Her line also anticipates the modern critique of “forever wars”: violence doesn’t resolve the underlying grievances, it multiplies them, then calls the multiplication “progress.”
Context matters: Rankin voted against U.S. entry into World War I and later opposed World War II after Pearl Harbor, nearly alone. This sentence is her political signature distilled: not innocence, but an insistence that the supposedly hardheaded answer is often the most self-defeating one.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Rankin, Jeanette. (2026, January 17). Killing more people won't help matters. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/killing-more-people-wont-help-matters-52045/
Chicago Style
Rankin, Jeanette. "Killing more people won't help matters." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/killing-more-people-wont-help-matters-52045/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Killing more people won't help matters." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/killing-more-people-wont-help-matters-52045/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.











