"Kinsey himself collected absolutely everything"
About this Quote
“Kinsey himself collected absolutely everything” lands like a marvel and a warning in the same breath. Coming from Bill Condon, a director attuned to how private lives get edited into public narratives, the line isn’t just biographical texture; it’s a thesis about obsession, authority, and the precarious ethics of archive-making.
The word “himself” does quiet work. It isolates Kinsey as the engine of his own myth: not merely a scientist gathering data, but a personality building a universe in which nothing can be left uncounted. “Absolutely everything” is hyperbole with intent. It gestures toward a near-totalizing hunger to document sex, behavior, bodies, testimony - the messy substrate a culture prefers to keep unrecorded. In the mid-century U.S., that impulse reads as both radical (dragging taboo into daylight) and invasive (turning lived experience into catalog).
Condon’s subtext is cinematic: collecting is a form of control. If you can store it, label it, sequence it, you can narrate it. That’s the seduction of Kinsey’s project and its potential distortion. The line also hints at the emotional cost: the collector’s life becomes subordinate to the collection, intimacy rerouted into evidence.
Contextually, it speaks to why Kinsey remains a lightning rod. His data promised a democratic portrait of desire while raising questions about consent, exploitation, and the power imbalance between the questioner and the confessed-to. Condon’s phrasing doesn’t acquit or condemn; it frames the man as an appetite - and invites us to ask what gets lost when “everything” becomes the goal.
The word “himself” does quiet work. It isolates Kinsey as the engine of his own myth: not merely a scientist gathering data, but a personality building a universe in which nothing can be left uncounted. “Absolutely everything” is hyperbole with intent. It gestures toward a near-totalizing hunger to document sex, behavior, bodies, testimony - the messy substrate a culture prefers to keep unrecorded. In the mid-century U.S., that impulse reads as both radical (dragging taboo into daylight) and invasive (turning lived experience into catalog).
Condon’s subtext is cinematic: collecting is a form of control. If you can store it, label it, sequence it, you can narrate it. That’s the seduction of Kinsey’s project and its potential distortion. The line also hints at the emotional cost: the collector’s life becomes subordinate to the collection, intimacy rerouted into evidence.
Contextually, it speaks to why Kinsey remains a lightning rod. His data promised a democratic portrait of desire while raising questions about consent, exploitation, and the power imbalance between the questioner and the confessed-to. Condon’s phrasing doesn’t acquit or condemn; it frames the man as an appetite - and invites us to ask what gets lost when “everything” becomes the goal.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|
More Quotes by Bill
Add to List
