"Knowledge is invariably a matter of degree: you cannot put your finger upon even the simplest datum and say this we know"
About this Quote
Certainty is the first thing Eliot is willing to deprive you of, and he does it with the cool authority of someone who’s spent a career watching grand systems of meaning crumble into footnotes. “Knowledge is invariably a matter of degree” doesn’t just hedge; it reframes knowing as a spectrum, not a switch. The line’s quiet provocation is that even the “simplest datum” comes pre-contaminated: by language, by interpretation, by the limits of attention. Try to “put your finger” on a fact and you discover the finger is part of the experiment.
The phrasing is doing stealthy work. “Invariably” sounds like a firm plank, then Eliot pulls it out from under you: you can’t point to anything and declare, cleanly, “this we know.” The collective “we” matters. He’s not describing private doubt; he’s pricking the social performance of certainty, the way institutions and crowds launder probability into truth-claims.
Contextually, this sits comfortably in Eliot’s modernist suspicion of inherited narratives. Early 20th-century Europe watched science accelerate, religion lose monopoly power, and politics turn “truth” into mass persuasion. Modernism’s artistic response wasn’t just fragmentation for style points; it was an epistemological mood swing. Eliot’s speaker is the anxious curator of a world where facts exist, but their boundaries won’t hold.
The subtext isn’t anti-intellectualism; it’s intellectual humility with teeth. Knowledge still matters, but it’s always provisional, always partial, always earned in increments rather than possessed like property. Eliot makes uncertainty feel less like a personal failure and more like the honest condition of being awake.
The phrasing is doing stealthy work. “Invariably” sounds like a firm plank, then Eliot pulls it out from under you: you can’t point to anything and declare, cleanly, “this we know.” The collective “we” matters. He’s not describing private doubt; he’s pricking the social performance of certainty, the way institutions and crowds launder probability into truth-claims.
Contextually, this sits comfortably in Eliot’s modernist suspicion of inherited narratives. Early 20th-century Europe watched science accelerate, religion lose monopoly power, and politics turn “truth” into mass persuasion. Modernism’s artistic response wasn’t just fragmentation for style points; it was an epistemological mood swing. Eliot’s speaker is the anxious curator of a world where facts exist, but their boundaries won’t hold.
The subtext isn’t anti-intellectualism; it’s intellectual humility with teeth. Knowledge still matters, but it’s always provisional, always partial, always earned in increments rather than possessed like property. Eliot makes uncertainty feel less like a personal failure and more like the honest condition of being awake.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by S. Eliot
Add to List









