"Knowledge is recognition of something absent; it is a salutation, not an embrace"
About this Quote
Knowledge greets what is not here. The mind points beyond the immediate glow of sensation toward objects, times, and truths that are absent from the present grip of experience. A salutation acknowledges, signals, and orients us; an embrace possesses. George Santayana insists that knowing belongs to the first set of acts. When you remember a childhood room, calculate an orbit, or identify a friend across the street, you are not fusing with those things. You are recognizing, representing, and addressing what stands apart.
This distinction is central to Santayana’s skeptical realism. Immediate awareness gives only appearances, the passing stream of sights, sounds, and feelings. To move from these to enduring objects, past events, scientific entities, or moral laws requires projection and trust. He called that practical trust animal faith: a natural, vital confidence that our signs track a world. Yet that world is never held directly in thought. The concepts, images, and formulas we use are like letters mailed to an address; they reach toward their addressee without collapsing the distance.
The metaphor corrects two temptations. Against naive realism, it denies that the object of knowledge is literally present in the mind. Against romantic subjectivism, it denies that knowing is a kind of ecstatic union. Knowing is courteous and disciplined: it keeps the dignity of the other. Science exemplifies this posture. Models and measurements are salutations with reach and restraint, effective precisely because they do not pretend to be the things themselves.
There is a moral to draw. Confusing recognition with possession breeds dogmatism. If knowing is greeting, not grasping, then fallibility and openness are not defects but conditions of clarity. Respect the otherness of what is known, and inquiry stays nimble, revisable, and humane. Santayana’s aphorism frames intelligence as an act of distance rightly kept, where good faith bridges absence without claiming an embrace it cannot give.
This distinction is central to Santayana’s skeptical realism. Immediate awareness gives only appearances, the passing stream of sights, sounds, and feelings. To move from these to enduring objects, past events, scientific entities, or moral laws requires projection and trust. He called that practical trust animal faith: a natural, vital confidence that our signs track a world. Yet that world is never held directly in thought. The concepts, images, and formulas we use are like letters mailed to an address; they reach toward their addressee without collapsing the distance.
The metaphor corrects two temptations. Against naive realism, it denies that the object of knowledge is literally present in the mind. Against romantic subjectivism, it denies that knowing is a kind of ecstatic union. Knowing is courteous and disciplined: it keeps the dignity of the other. Science exemplifies this posture. Models and measurements are salutations with reach and restraint, effective precisely because they do not pretend to be the things themselves.
There is a moral to draw. Confusing recognition with possession breeds dogmatism. If knowing is greeting, not grasping, then fallibility and openness are not defects but conditions of clarity. Respect the otherness of what is known, and inquiry stays nimble, revisable, and humane. Santayana’s aphorism frames intelligence as an act of distance rightly kept, where good faith bridges absence without claiming an embrace it cannot give.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|
More Quotes by George
Add to List
