"Labor can and will become its own employer through co-operative association"
About this Quote
A robber baron talking up co-ops is the kind of line that forces you to read it twice. Leland Stanford, railroad magnate and avatar of Gilded Age capital, wraps a volatile promise in soothing inevitability: "can and will". That future tense is doing the heavy lifting. It doesn’t just imagine worker power; it predicts it, as if social conflict can be solved by historical momentum rather than bargaining, law, or blood. The sentence performs reassurance for an anxious era when strikes, unionization, and anti-monopoly anger were no longer fringe noise but a live threat to the legitimacy of industrial fortunes.
"Labor" is treated as a single actor, almost a corporation in waiting. That abstraction conveniently sidesteps the messy diversity of workers and the power asymmetries that make "association" hard to sustain. Co-operation here reads less like a radical transfer of ownership and more like a safety valve: give workers a vision of self-management that channels anger away from state intervention, regulation, or class confrontation. It’s a managerial dream disguised as emancipation.
The subtext is also reputational. Stanford and his peers faced growing accusations that they had built empires on public land grants, political influence, and brutal working conditions. A line like this reframes the industrial order as a ladder, not a trap: if workers are patient and disciplined, they can graduate into employers themselves. It’s aspirational, tidy, and politically useful precisely because it makes structural critique look like impatience.
"Labor" is treated as a single actor, almost a corporation in waiting. That abstraction conveniently sidesteps the messy diversity of workers and the power asymmetries that make "association" hard to sustain. Co-operation here reads less like a radical transfer of ownership and more like a safety valve: give workers a vision of self-management that channels anger away from state intervention, regulation, or class confrontation. It’s a managerial dream disguised as emancipation.
The subtext is also reputational. Stanford and his peers faced growing accusations that they had built empires on public land grants, political influence, and brutal working conditions. A line like this reframes the industrial order as a ladder, not a trap: if workers are patient and disciplined, they can graduate into employers themselves. It’s aspirational, tidy, and politically useful precisely because it makes structural critique look like impatience.
Quote Details
| Topic | Business |
|---|
More Quotes by Leland
Add to List

