"Let me be clear, Mr. President, mistakes have been made in Iraq. And this operation has been far from perfect as evidenced by the fact that Zarqawi and other terrorists continue to wreak havoc throughout Iraq"
About this Quote
“Let me be clear” is Washington’s throat-clearing: a promise of candor that usually signals disciplined evasiveness. Elizabeth Dole’s line lands in that familiar register, using the language of accountability (“mistakes have been made”) while carefully refusing to assign an actor to the mistakes. It’s the passive voice doing political triage, acknowledging public frustration without naming who should pay for it.
The address to “Mr. President” gives it the posture of confrontation, but the subtext is intra-party management as much as oversight. Dole, a Republican senator, is threading a needle: she can’t ignore the mounting evidence that the Iraq war’s planning and aftermath were chaotic, yet she also can’t hand Democrats a clean indictment of the Bush administration. So the critique gets laundered through technocratic understatement: not perfect, an operation, mistakes.
Then comes the pivot that reveals the strategic intent. By invoking Zarqawi, Dole shifts the story from misjudgment to menace. The ongoing violence becomes proof not of a flawed premise but of an unfinished task, a rhetorical move that converts criticism into justification: yes, errors occurred, but look at the enemy still “wreaking havoc.” It’s a way of preserving the war’s moral frame (counterterrorism) while conceding its operational failures.
Context matters: mid-2000s Iraq was defined by insurgency, sectarian bloodshed, and U.S. credibility hemorrhaging at home. Dole’s sentence tries to absorb that reality without letting it metastasize into a broader repudiation of the project. It’s contrition with guardrails.
The address to “Mr. President” gives it the posture of confrontation, but the subtext is intra-party management as much as oversight. Dole, a Republican senator, is threading a needle: she can’t ignore the mounting evidence that the Iraq war’s planning and aftermath were chaotic, yet she also can’t hand Democrats a clean indictment of the Bush administration. So the critique gets laundered through technocratic understatement: not perfect, an operation, mistakes.
Then comes the pivot that reveals the strategic intent. By invoking Zarqawi, Dole shifts the story from misjudgment to menace. The ongoing violence becomes proof not of a flawed premise but of an unfinished task, a rhetorical move that converts criticism into justification: yes, errors occurred, but look at the enemy still “wreaking havoc.” It’s a way of preserving the war’s moral frame (counterterrorism) while conceding its operational failures.
Context matters: mid-2000s Iraq was defined by insurgency, sectarian bloodshed, and U.S. credibility hemorrhaging at home. Dole’s sentence tries to absorb that reality without letting it metastasize into a broader repudiation of the project. It’s contrition with guardrails.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Elizabeth
Add to List




