"Let us not paralyze our capacity for good by brooding of man's capacity for evil"
About this Quote
Sarnoff’s line reads like a memo sent from the future to an anxious present: stop doom-scrolling the human condition and go build something. The verb choice does the work. “Paralyze” frames moral hesitation as a physical failure, a kind of self-inflicted immobility. It’s not that evil doesn’t exist; it’s that obsessive vigilance can become its own form of surrender, draining the energy that might otherwise be spent on repair, invention, policy, or care.
The subtext is a defense of constructive optimism at a moment when the 20th century kept offering reasons to quit. Sarnoff wasn’t a cloistered philosopher; he helped shape mass communication, an arena where “man’s capacity for evil” is always a live wire: propaganda, panic, demagoguery, the weaponization of attention. A radio executive who lived through world wars, ideological mania, and the industrialization of violence would have understood how easily fear becomes a governing instrument. His warning isn’t naive; it’s strategic. If your imagination fixates on worst-case outcomes, you start pre-emptively censoring ambition, mistrusting institutions, and retreating into cynicism that feels like sophistication.
There’s also an implicit argument about responsibility in technological modernity: tools amplify whatever humans bring to them. Sarnoff’s intent is to keep the “capacity for good” in motion even when the news proves we’re capable of atrocity. It’s a rebuke to the posture of knowingness-the reflex to treat cynicism as moral seriousness. He’s insisting that goodness requires forward momentum, not perfect certainty.
The subtext is a defense of constructive optimism at a moment when the 20th century kept offering reasons to quit. Sarnoff wasn’t a cloistered philosopher; he helped shape mass communication, an arena where “man’s capacity for evil” is always a live wire: propaganda, panic, demagoguery, the weaponization of attention. A radio executive who lived through world wars, ideological mania, and the industrialization of violence would have understood how easily fear becomes a governing instrument. His warning isn’t naive; it’s strategic. If your imagination fixates on worst-case outcomes, you start pre-emptively censoring ambition, mistrusting institutions, and retreating into cynicism that feels like sophistication.
There’s also an implicit argument about responsibility in technological modernity: tools amplify whatever humans bring to them. Sarnoff’s intent is to keep the “capacity for good” in motion even when the news proves we’re capable of atrocity. It’s a rebuke to the posture of knowingness-the reflex to treat cynicism as moral seriousness. He’s insisting that goodness requires forward momentum, not perfect certainty.
Quote Details
| Topic | Optimism |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by David
Add to List












