"Let's leave behind the predictable and stale debate between liberals and conservatives. Let's take the resources that we have, and prioritize, and manage, and focus our energy on just doing things that count - on real results"
About this Quote
Bredesen’s line is a politician’s attempt to launder ideology through managerial competence. The opening move - “leave behind the predictable and stale debate” - doesn’t just criticize partisan bickering; it reframes disagreement as theatrical habit, not a clash of values. If liberals and conservatives are merely “predictable,” then the speaker can position himself above them, as the adult in the room, without naming what he actually believes.
The rhythm does the heavy lifting. “Take the resources that we have, and prioritize, and manage, and focus” is a staircase of technocratic verbs, each one cooler and more procedural than the last. It’s not accidental: the language borrows the credibility of business and public administration, where competence is measured in process and metrics. By the time he lands on “doing things that count,” the audience has been invited to equate “count” with what can be counted: budgets balanced, programs streamlined, targets hit.
The subtext is triangulation, a late-20th/early-21st-century Democratic move in Southern and swing-state politics: promise “real results” to moderates exhausted by culture war, while implying that ideological purity is indulgent. “Real results” is also a clever shield. Who’s against results? Yet the phrase quietly dodges the hardest democratic question: results for whom, and at what cost?
Contextually, this is the vernacular of bipartisan fatigue and performance governance - a pitch to voters who suspect politics has become identity theater and want a CEO, not a combatant. It works because it offers moral relief: you don’t have to pick a side, just pick competence.
The rhythm does the heavy lifting. “Take the resources that we have, and prioritize, and manage, and focus” is a staircase of technocratic verbs, each one cooler and more procedural than the last. It’s not accidental: the language borrows the credibility of business and public administration, where competence is measured in process and metrics. By the time he lands on “doing things that count,” the audience has been invited to equate “count” with what can be counted: budgets balanced, programs streamlined, targets hit.
The subtext is triangulation, a late-20th/early-21st-century Democratic move in Southern and swing-state politics: promise “real results” to moderates exhausted by culture war, while implying that ideological purity is indulgent. “Real results” is also a clever shield. Who’s against results? Yet the phrase quietly dodges the hardest democratic question: results for whom, and at what cost?
Contextually, this is the vernacular of bipartisan fatigue and performance governance - a pitch to voters who suspect politics has become identity theater and want a CEO, not a combatant. It works because it offers moral relief: you don’t have to pick a side, just pick competence.
Quote Details
| Topic | Management |
|---|
More Quotes by Phil
Add to List
