"Liberals are concerned about the concentration of wealth because it almost inevitably leads to a concentration of power that undermines democracy"
About this Quote
Reich’s line is less a moral complaint about rich people than a structural warning about what money does when it piles up. The phrasing “almost inevitably” is doing heavy lifting: it frames oligarchy not as a freak accident or a few bad actors, but as the default setting of laissez-faire inequality. That’s a deliberate rebuke to the comforting idea that markets can stay “free” while politics stays “fair.”
The subtext is about the pipeline from wealth to power: campaign finance, lobbying armies, think-tank ecosystems, revolving-door appointments, friendly media ownership, even the quieter power to set the agenda by funding what gets researched, litigated, or legislated. Reich is arguing that democracy doesn’t just get threatened at the ballot box; it gets softened upstream, where policy options are pre-filtered by those who can afford access.
“Liberals” functions here as a rhetorical anchor, not a tribal shout. It signals a tradition: the New Deal lineage that treats government as the counterweight to private concentration. Coming from an economist and former Labor Secretary, the context isn’t campus rhetoric; it’s a diagnosis born of watching deregulation, weakened unions, and tax policy reshape bargaining power since the late 20th century. Reich’s intent is to shift the debate from envy to engineering: if you care about democratic outcomes, you can’t ignore the input conditions. The punch is that inequality isn’t only an economic metric; it’s a constitutional stress test.
The subtext is about the pipeline from wealth to power: campaign finance, lobbying armies, think-tank ecosystems, revolving-door appointments, friendly media ownership, even the quieter power to set the agenda by funding what gets researched, litigated, or legislated. Reich is arguing that democracy doesn’t just get threatened at the ballot box; it gets softened upstream, where policy options are pre-filtered by those who can afford access.
“Liberals” functions here as a rhetorical anchor, not a tribal shout. It signals a tradition: the New Deal lineage that treats government as the counterweight to private concentration. Coming from an economist and former Labor Secretary, the context isn’t campus rhetoric; it’s a diagnosis born of watching deregulation, weakened unions, and tax policy reshape bargaining power since the late 20th century. Reich’s intent is to shift the debate from envy to engineering: if you care about democratic outcomes, you can’t ignore the input conditions. The punch is that inequality isn’t only an economic metric; it’s a constitutional stress test.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wealth |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List





