"Libertarians argue that no normal adult has the right to impose choices on other normal adults, except in abnormal circumstances, such as when one person finds another unconscious and administers medical assistance or calls an ambulance"
About this Quote
Palmer smuggles a whole political theory into an apparently modest sentence by leaning on a deceptively loaded word: "normal". Libertarianism, in his framing, isn’t a romance about rugged individualism; it’s a default rule for everyday life. Adults get to choose, even when their choices are bad, irritating, or morally questionable. The only time intervention becomes legitimate is when agency has clearly vanished - "unconscious" is doing a lot of work here - and the intervention is narrowly aimed at restoring the person’s capacity to choose again.
That structure is the intent: draw a crisp boundary between paternalism (telling competent people how to live) and emergency aid (helping someone return to competence). It’s not a sweeping anti-government manifesto so much as an ethical posture: presume autonomy until autonomy is demonstrably absent.
The subtext is where the argument sharpens. By calling the exception "abnormal circumstances", Palmer implies that most justifications for coercion are rhetorical tricks - treating ordinary disagreement as an emergency. Public-health mandates, drug bans, "for your own good" regulations: these are, in the libertarian critique, attempts to redefine normal adult risk-taking as incapacitation. The ambulance example is strategically disarming because it’s humane; it signals that libertarianism isn’t indifference, it’s restraint.
Contextually, this is pedagogy as persuasion. An educator’s move: anchor an abstract principle (non-imposition) in a widely accepted moral intuition (you help the unconscious). The quote tries to make libertarianism feel less like ideology and more like basic etiquette with teeth.
That structure is the intent: draw a crisp boundary between paternalism (telling competent people how to live) and emergency aid (helping someone return to competence). It’s not a sweeping anti-government manifesto so much as an ethical posture: presume autonomy until autonomy is demonstrably absent.
The subtext is where the argument sharpens. By calling the exception "abnormal circumstances", Palmer implies that most justifications for coercion are rhetorical tricks - treating ordinary disagreement as an emergency. Public-health mandates, drug bans, "for your own good" regulations: these are, in the libertarian critique, attempts to redefine normal adult risk-taking as incapacitation. The ambulance example is strategically disarming because it’s humane; it signals that libertarianism isn’t indifference, it’s restraint.
Contextually, this is pedagogy as persuasion. An educator’s move: anchor an abstract principle (non-imposition) in a widely accepted moral intuition (you help the unconscious). The quote tries to make libertarianism feel less like ideology and more like basic etiquette with teeth.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Tom
Add to List
