"Like I said, I'm more worried long term about the environmental issues then the use of arms"
About this Quote
Blix is doing something quietly radical here: he’s rearranging the hierarchy of emergency. Coming from the diplomat most associated (fairly or not) with the Iraq WMD saga, the line reads like a sideways rebuke to the world’s adrenaline addiction. “Use of arms” is the headline crisis - dramatic, televisual, morally clarifying in the short term. Environmental collapse is the slow catastrophe: diffuse, bureaucratically inconvenient, and therefore easy to treat as tomorrow’s problem until tomorrow becomes now.
The phrasing matters. “Like I said” is a softener with teeth. It signals repetition, even frustration: he’s been making this case and watching it get politely ignored. “More worried long term” is diplomatic understatement doing real work. He’s not claiming wars don’t matter; he’s insisting the timescale is the real battleground. Nations mobilize instantly for missiles and invasions, then plead helplessness when asked to mobilize for carbon, toxics, and resource depletion - threats that don’t respect borders, ceasefires, or victory speeches.
The subtext is also about governance and evidence. Arms control is comparatively legible: you can count warheads, inspect sites, sign treaties. Environmental harm is cumulative and system-wide; accountability dissolves across supply chains and election cycles. Blix’s intent is to push policy out of crisis theater and into stewardship, implying that the world’s security imagination is stuck in the 20th century while the 21st century’s biggest weapon is the atmosphere itself.
The phrasing matters. “Like I said” is a softener with teeth. It signals repetition, even frustration: he’s been making this case and watching it get politely ignored. “More worried long term” is diplomatic understatement doing real work. He’s not claiming wars don’t matter; he’s insisting the timescale is the real battleground. Nations mobilize instantly for missiles and invasions, then plead helplessness when asked to mobilize for carbon, toxics, and resource depletion - threats that don’t respect borders, ceasefires, or victory speeches.
The subtext is also about governance and evidence. Arms control is comparatively legible: you can count warheads, inspect sites, sign treaties. Environmental harm is cumulative and system-wide; accountability dissolves across supply chains and election cycles. Blix’s intent is to push policy out of crisis theater and into stewardship, implying that the world’s security imagination is stuck in the 20th century while the 21st century’s biggest weapon is the atmosphere itself.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Hans
Add to List



