"Like other important immigrant communities, the Jewish experience in the United States represents the ideal of freedom and the promise and opportunity of America"
About this Quote
In one sentence, Jan Schakowsky tries to do two things at once: praise a specific community while laundering a bigger claim about America itself. By framing the Jewish experience as an emblem of "the ideal of freedom", she’s not just offering admiration; she’s recruiting a historical narrative as proof-of-concept for the national brand. The line works because it’s built like a political bridge: start with the particular (Jewish immigration), widen to the general (immigrant communities), arrive at the universal (America as promise).
The subtext is defensive as much as celebratory. Spoken in an era of periodic backlash against immigrants and a recurring spike in antisemitism, the quote quietly insists that Jewish belonging is not conditional. "Like other important immigrant communities" is a deliberate positioning: it resists treating Jews as an exception, a separate case, or a community only legible through persecution. It also signals coalition politics - a common move in Democratic rhetoric that ties Jewish history to a broader immigrant mosaic.
The context doing the heaviest lifting is the tension between myth and record. The U.S. has offered refuge and mobility to many Jewish immigrants, even as it has also imposed quotas, tolerated discrimination, and periodically turned away those in danger. Schakowsky smooths that contradiction into aspirational language, not because she’s unaware of it, but because aspirational language is how politicians make an argument without litigating every fact. The intent is clarity: Jews are part of the American "we", and the immigrant story is still supposed to mean something.
The subtext is defensive as much as celebratory. Spoken in an era of periodic backlash against immigrants and a recurring spike in antisemitism, the quote quietly insists that Jewish belonging is not conditional. "Like other important immigrant communities" is a deliberate positioning: it resists treating Jews as an exception, a separate case, or a community only legible through persecution. It also signals coalition politics - a common move in Democratic rhetoric that ties Jewish history to a broader immigrant mosaic.
The context doing the heaviest lifting is the tension between myth and record. The U.S. has offered refuge and mobility to many Jewish immigrants, even as it has also imposed quotas, tolerated discrimination, and periodically turned away those in danger. Schakowsky smooths that contradiction into aspirational language, not because she’s unaware of it, but because aspirational language is how politicians make an argument without litigating every fact. The intent is clarity: Jews are part of the American "we", and the immigrant story is still supposed to mean something.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Jan
Add to List




